Faithful successor to the Warcraft 3 map
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“Coming from the original Warcraft III Legion TD this is a successor that improves upon the concept in every way.”
Steam review · 617.9 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$24.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 5 h ago
A deep, competitive team-based tower defense/auto battler from the Warcraft 3 map, with very active devs. Skip it if you dislike toxic PvP, uneven matchmaking or constant balance changes.
Great for
Warcraft 3 Legion TD veterans and strategy fans who enjoy team play and economy-vs-defense decisions
Main risk
Toxic community and uneven matchmaking (solos vs premades), plus frequent balance swings
25 recent reviews
Recent negative reviews cite the $25 price, balance team decisions, tiny UI and AI-generated art, plus toxicity for returning players. Evidence is thin, so low confidence.
25 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“Coming from the original Warcraft III Legion TD this is a successor that improves upon the concept in every way.”
Steam review · 617.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Amazing the fact it is still getting monthly updates all these years later.”
Steam review · 1022 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“It's easy to understand at first, and has a huge amount of depth once you start learning the units, builds and different ways to outplay the opposing team.”
Steam review · 1047.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“still never end up doing the same build every time”
Steam review · 575.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“I'd recommend it to a casual like myself who likes to hop into a game, play for 15-30 minutes and go on with the day.”
Steam review · 659.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“playing co-op with a friend is a pleasure”
Steam review · translated · 104.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“Playing solo you even get matched against much higher ranked premade lobbys (because of not enough people queuing)”
Steam review · 474.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“After a handful of levels I found out I had to buy DLC to play next part of the solo campaign.”
Steam review · 4.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 negative reviews
“The overly toxic community. The devs won't do anything regarding moderation or toxic behavior in this community in the game or in discord.”
Steam review · 4206.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 negative reviews
“Silly always online even for single player in combination with regular reconnecting issues killed the game for me.”
Steam review · 13.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 negative reviews
“constant nerfs to everything that works and minor buffs to some things that dont work.”
Steam review · 339.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 negative reviews
“Auto feature lowkey ruined the game. People are not incentivized to think”
Steam review · 1432.3 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Nostalgic classic flash games on Steam
− No widescreen or 4K support
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Addictive mine-upgrade-defend loop
− Repetitive, grindy gameplay
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Great sequel to the original
− Brutal difficulty and spikes
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Addictive, replayable roguelike loop
− No speed-up button
analyzed 4 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click