Addictive, replayable roguelike loop
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“randomly generated maps make for infinite replay-ability and it's just a joy to play.”
Steam review · 156.1 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
−40%$14.99$8.99
US Steam price, checked 5 h ago
A simple but deep roguelike tower defense with expanding procedural maps, great music and high replayability. Skip it if you hate heavy RNG, missing QoL like speed-up and saves, or an abandoned game.
Great for
Tower defense fans who like chill, replayable runs with RNG-driven builds, ideally with QoL mods
Main risk
Heavy RNG and missing basics (no speed-up, no save, bad UI) in a game the dev has abandoned
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“randomly generated maps make for infinite replay-ability and it's just a joy to play.”
Steam review · 156.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“What is really is cool is that each map is procedurally generated and can create for a unique challenge each and every game.”
Steam review · 22.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“It's so SIMPLE but so DEEP! I can't get enough!”
Steam review · 33.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“A fun game to keep on in the background and slowly puzzle your way though.”
Steam review · 333.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“soundtrack has absolutely no business being this good.”
Steam review · 17.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“Also it has 140 achievements which is wild for the achievement hunters.”
Steam review · 34.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“you cannot fast forward, the developer knows of this but refuses to change the game for his players”
Steam review · 20.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“It even HAS a UI scale option, but it's not even 1/10th what it needs to be.”
Steam review · 11.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“the game is basically just unfun gambling with the path determining 99% of what you do.”
Steam review · 24.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Now the dev has decided to endlessly tweak and adjust the game, with every change making it worse.”
Steam review · 43.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“Abandonware. Even worse, the creator was asked to implement QOL changes such as gamespeed updates, deck option updates.”
Steam review · 124.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“Great Game, but not being able to save mid-run is a deal breaker.”
Steam review · 14.2 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Nostalgic classic flash games on Steam
− No widescreen or 4K support
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Addictive mine-upgrade-defend loop
− Repetitive, grindy gameplay
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Great sequel to the original
− Brutal difficulty and spikes
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Lots of free content and upgrades
− Repetitive and boring
analyzed 5 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click