Funny duck Napoleonic concept
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“Hundreds of ducks in one match, a dedicated quack button and a plethora of regiments.”
Steam review · 2.5 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 145 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 145 Steam reviews actually say.
Free to play
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 2 h ago
A cheap, charming, silly Napoleonic line-battle shooter with ducks and a friendly community. Skip it if you want polish or reliably populated servers without Discord or friends.
Great for
Napoleonic-era fans and duck lovers who want unserious line battles with friends or a Discord community
Main risk
Few players online and dead servers, so matches depend on Discord, events or bots
10 recent reviews
Recent negatives point to bad server hosting, only EU servers and little to do. Based on only two recent negative reviews, so confidence is low.
10 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“Hundreds of ducks in one match, a dedicated quack button and a plethora of regiments.”
Steam review · 2.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“Great dev team who interact with the community and actually take feedback, constant communitiy support.”
Steam review · 4.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 positive reviews
“nothing required to play, and I am very impressed how it is free.”
Steam review · 4.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“you can usually find a game by going to looking for games in the discord or going to a scheduled event, which usually has WAY more people.”
Steam review · 17.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 23 positive reviews
“since they added bots, you can have large scale and fun battles/practice alone.”
Steam review · 1.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 45 positive reviews
“Runs solid on Linux and windows, with large scale battles not dropping FPS to any great extent.”
Steam review · 1.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“cool game but the servers are dead. only way to play with real people is with pure luck or joining at a certain time.”
Steam review · 26.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“it still feels like it’s missing quite a few things to become a truly enjoyable, complete experience.”
Steam review · 1.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Unbelievably bad design, bad Server hosting, complicated settings and all in all no fun.”
Steam review · 0.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“every other nation's community is just dead and inactive.”
Steam review · 62.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“No tutorial which makes it extremely confusing”
Steam review · 0.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“Im unable to even close the game, whenever i closed it, its been saying "stopping" for three damn days”
Steam review · 39 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Many ways to play and contribute
− Grind and vertical progression favor no-lifers
analyzed 13 min ago

+ Hilarious with friends
− Broken matchmaking, lobbies and dead playerbase
analyzed 51 min ago

+ Fast, satisfying instakill gameplay
− No players or servers online
analyzed 1 h ago

+ Great potential for an early access game
− Terrible optimization and lag
analyzed 2 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click