Great potential for an early access game
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 positive reviews
“amazing potential. great bones - just needs more time in the oven.”
Steam review · 1.8 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 129 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 129 Steam reviews actually say.
$29.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 2 h ago
A gritty, atmospheric Ukraine-war milsim/extraction hybrid with strong potential, but poor optimization, few players and early-access jank. Skip it if you want a polished game.
Great for
Milsim fans (Arma, Tarkov, Squad) who accept early-access jank and want to back an active dev team
Main risk
Poor performance and a tiny player base can make the game rough or hard to play
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 positive reviews
“amazing potential. great bones - just needs more time in the oven.”
Steam review · 1.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“Very atmospheric and immersive. A nice and different milsim experience.”
Steam review · 0.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“UPDATE 2: 9 patches in under 2 weeks since EA release, these devs care”
Steam review · 29.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“The "extraction shooter" loadout system works really well at adding that extra layer of "I don't want to die!" grounded in realism”
Steam review · 8.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“The game has excellent gunplay, including mechanics like raising and lowering your weapon, canting, switching hands, and weapon jamming.”
Steam review · 2.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 positive reviews
“i love the focus on PVE and singleplayer too, so even if player count is low you can still play.”
Steam review · 0.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~3 in 5 negative reviews
“this is one of the worst performing UE5 games I’ve ever played.”
Steam review · 0.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“The whole interface is ai made.”
Steam review · 0.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“I struggled to get into most modes, waiting with 2 others for over 20 minutes for a 12 person mode.”
Steam review · 0.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Movement is another area that needs attention, as it currently feels clunky, heavy”
Steam review · 1.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“It is sloppy, unoptimised and bare.”
Steam review · 2.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“telling friend from foe can be difficult. But in this game it's nigh impossible”
Steam review · 0.8 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Many ways to play and contribute
− Grind and vertical progression favor no-lifers
analyzed 15 min ago

+ Hilarious with friends
− Broken matchmaking, lobbies and dead playerbase
analyzed 53 min ago

+ Fast, satisfying instakill gameplay
− No players or servers online
analyzed 1 h ago

+ Funny duck Napoleonic concept
− Dead servers and low player count
analyzed 2 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click