Nostalgic classic that still holds up
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Just started playing it again after over a decade , still holds up !”
Steam review · 26.1 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A short, unique WW2 paratrooper shooter with free-choice landings and weapon upgrades, but buggy and clunky on modern PCs. Skip it if you hate jank or bullet-sponge enemies.
Great for
Nostalgic WW2 shooter fans who tolerate jank and want a short, open-ended single-player campaign
Main risk
Bugs, PhysX/launch problems and clunky aiming on modern PCs, plus a very short campaign
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Just started playing it again after over a decade , still holds up !”
Steam review · 26.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Ability to land anywhere works nicely along with a checkpoint system that forces you to get something on the map done or risk parachuting right back to where you were under heavy fire.”
Steam review · 7.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“I love that when you get a certain number of kills you get upgrades for your weapons.”
Steam review · 22.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“Great game looks awesome for it's age and well optimised.”
Steam review · 17.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“open leveldesign - multiple fronts”
Steam review · 7.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“when aiming down sight you can move your mouse to peak around corners/over obstacles, its a great feature.”
Steam review · 1.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“How does the game manage to get me stuck by lightly rubbing against a wall... I can understand if that happens once, or twice, but it must've happened a dozen times.”
Steam review · 3.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“Sight right on them with a bar. Miss miss miss miss.”
Steam review · 15.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“You have to painstakingly clear enemies to achieve the objectives, but then you die and they all come back, making your effort pointless.”
Steam review · 52.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“Impossible to play in 2020 because of the stupid Nvidia PhysX requirement that fails to recognize updated versions.”
Steam review · 0.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“Campaign is barely 3.5 hours.”
Steam review · 15.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“Why are there machine-gun-wielding bullet sponges, am I playing Return to Castle Wolfenstein?”
Steam review · 8.5 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Vastly improved since the rough launch
− Secure Boot and kernel anti-cheat required
analyzed 29 d ago

+ Unique RTS and FPS hybrid concept
− Poor optimization, low fps and crashes
analyzed 47 min ago

+ Great party game with friends
− Gets boring and repetitive quickly
analyzed 56 min ago

+ Intense, rewarding extra challenge
− Overlong, tedious enemy-spam encounters
analyzed 2 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click