Addictive progression and achievements
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“There’s always one more upgrade to buy, one more quest to finish or one more thing to unlock”
Steam review · 11.4 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Free to play
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 2 h ago
A deep, free pixel-art idle/platformer hybrid with lots to unlock and cross-platform sync, but it demands active play and slows to a grind. Skip it if you want a truly hands-off idler.
Great for
Patient players who like daily check-ins, achievement hunting and active-idle incrementals
Main risk
It's not really idle: progress needs active play, then stalls into a long grind
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“There’s always one more upgrade to buy, one more quest to finish or one more thing to unlock”
Steam review · 11.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“how is this game free? it has so much content like a giant skill tree, tons of upgrades and somehow over 600 achievements!!!”
Steam review · 62.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“An overall good incremental idle game with a great active-idle balance, lots of nice minigames”
Steam review · 315.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“Idle Slayer uses a cloud sync save system, so no matter what you're playing on, as long as you make an account you can continue your progress wherever, whenever.”
Steam review · 7.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“very enjoyable incremental game with zero scummy practices.”
Steam review · 181.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“The pixel-art style and retro soundtrack create a cozy atmosphere”
Steam review · 12.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“your progress slows down dramatically. And even worse: the further you progress in this now miserable and boring grind”
Steam review · 185.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“It's a pretty good incremental but it is NOT an idle game. Offline progress overnight equates to a few minutes of active play”
Steam review · 62.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“This game is straight up just a monetisation engine.”
Steam review · 1.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“It shows in it's false ad that after just five days the gameplay gets kinda cool and more interactive, but that's a lie.”
Steam review · 7.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“you spend a lot of time collecting chips through free attempts, only to lose everything very quickly once you try your luck at gambling.”
Steam review · 379.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“I invested almost a 1000 hours into this game, thinking that steam cloud is available. Played for a year+. Changed PC, there is no cloud save unless you manually register it, 900+ save gone.”
Steam review · 928 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Excellent Lovecraftian writing and lore
− Boring, shallow gameplay with no real choices
analyzed 16 min ago

+ Relaxing and addictive time-killer
− Heavy paywalls and microtransactions
analyzed 2 h ago

+ Fun way to learn Python basics
− Poor teaching for true beginners
analyzed 3 h ago

+ Build variety and depth
− Aggressive monetization and pay-to-win feel
analyzed 3 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click