Excellent Lovecraftian writing and lore
Mentioned in ~3 in 5 positive reviews
“if you're a fan of the King in Yellow stories, I'd say this is a must-buy. It's some of the best KiY fiction I've read in ages.”
Steam review · 15.3 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 202 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 202 Steam reviews actually say.
$3.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 53 min ago
A cheap, atmospheric Lovecraftian idler with standout writing, art and black metal music, but thin, slow, unbalanced gameplay. Skip it if you want deep incremental systems.
Great for
King in Yellow/Lovecraft fans and metal fans wanting a cheap background idler with great lore
Main risk
Shallow, slow, poorly balanced gameplay with long waits and little to do
102 recent reviews
Recent negatives focus on slow pacing, balance, and a broken Prestige V upgrade, despite the 1.0 launch and QOL patches. Positive reviews say patches helped. Moderately confident.
102 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~3 in 5 positive reviews
“if you're a fan of the King in Yellow stories, I'd say this is a must-buy. It's some of the best KiY fiction I've read in ages.”
Steam review · 15.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 2 positive reviews
“Great atmosphere, art, sound, and story.”
Steam review · 15.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“You wanna listen to some epic Black Metal while playing what Cookie Clicker could be if it was actually good and deep?”
Steam review · 53.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Definitely worth the $4 I paid on sale.”
Steam review · 2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“the devs are listening to criticism, handling it very professionally and already making changes fixing the issues.”
Steam review · 30.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“it is more like a background thing to do while doing other things”
Steam review · 5.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 2 negative reviews
“there is not any kind of "build", everyone's run will feel similar.”
Steam review · 17.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“Even for an idler this is unbearably slow.”
Steam review · 2.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“the game lacks basic balancing between the choices you can make, a lot of choices essentially do nothing or don't scale enough to be meaningful as you progress.”
Steam review · 14 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“The X to close a window changes location with every menu.”
Steam review · 8.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“It's a buggy mess with bad pacing, this never should have been released from beta.”
Steam review · 5.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“Auto clicker is mandatory.”
Steam review · 0.2 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Players want more content
− Too little content, feels like early access
analyzed 13 min ago

+ Addictive, satisfying organizing loop
− Multiplayer limited to a short arcade mode
analyzed 46 min ago

+ Fun, relaxing, satisfying loop
− Upgrades run out too early
analyzed 3 h ago

+ Great value for the low price
− Multiplayer feels fake, mostly algorithmic
analyzed 4 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click