Deep build variety and skill trees
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“Why more ARPGS do not steal the idea of separate passive trees for every skill?”
Steam review · 388.2 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A well-liked ARPG with deep skill trees and friendly crafting, sitting between Diablo and PoE. Skip it if you want a deep endgame or are bothered by paid classes and shaky servers.
Great for
Players who want an ARPG deeper than Diablo but simpler than Path of Exile, with flexible builds and crafting
Main risk
Server disconnects at season launches and a repetitive endgame you may exhaust quickly
138 recent reviews
Many recent reviews report Error 65 and disconnects at the season 5 launch. Others say full offline mode now requires a connection, and some mention a mandatory data contract. Fairly consistent across recent reviews.
138 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“Why more ARPGS do not steal the idea of separate passive trees for every skill?”
Steam review · 388.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“more complicated than diablo but less complicated than POE, just the perfect balance”
Steam review · 188 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“Best crafting and skill system in any ARPG i've played.”
Steam review · 487.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“there is NO DRM, no requirement for online connection, no restriction for steam client.”
Steam review · 18.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“The systems design and creature comforts (looking at you, loot filter) are especially good”
Steam review · 179.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“It's very easy to pick up and make progress even if you only have 15-30 minutes to play at a time.”
Steam review · 60.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“Today, they have broken that promise and are now going to introduce paid DLC classes.”
Steam review · 537.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“the game has just been bought by Krafton who is disgustingly proud of being an "AI first" company.”
Steam review · 314.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“yet its missing the last two chapters despite leaving early access.”
Steam review · 17.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“Every single launch, they have massive problems with disconnects everywhere.”
Steam review · 289.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“It becomes a 'yawn simulator' for me.”
Steam review · 203.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 30 negative reviews
“Removed full offline mode without any announcement or patch notes.”
Steam review · 898.2 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Vast, rewarding open world to explore
− Paid Tarnished Edition DLC backlash
analyzed 2 h ago

+ Best gunplay in the series
− Poor optimization and stuttering
analyzed 52 min ago

+ Immersive, authentic Hogwarts atmosphere
− Repetitive, empty open world and collectibles
analyzed 54 min ago

+ Best ARPG and Diablo alternative
− Server lag, disconnects and no offline mode
analyzed 1 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click