Intriguing story and funny twist ending
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“The story is genuinely wonderful and unfolds in a really clever way between two players”
Steam review · 12.1 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$5.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 5 h ago
A short, clever offline two-player puzzle game built on describing your screens to each other, with lovely art. Skip it if you hate gotcha endings or want a long game.
Great for
Couples and friends wanting a one-evening co-op puzzle game over voice chat
Main risk
Very short, needs two copies, and the "you wasted your time" ending feels mocking to many
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“The story is genuinely wonderful and unfolds in a really clever way between two players”
Steam review · 12.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“the puzzles are creative and the difficulty is just right to make you and your partner use your brains but not be stuck for a long time”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Very short, but a great puzzle game for you and a friend for the price!”
Steam review · 2.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Each player sees different parts of the same world, so every puzzle depends on describing, listening, and thinking together.”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“The hand-drawn art style is charming with a slightly eerie, fairytale vibe that fits the time-loop mystery well.”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“you play two seperate games where you need answers from one another to go on in the story, so no internet problems!”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“I absolutely hated the ending where it claims I've wasted my time.”
Steam review · 2.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“the ending is mostly just confusing in terms of antagonist motivations, and how the magic clocks give and take”
Steam review · 2.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Chapter 3 sucks, frankly. It is very poorly designed and has far too many leaps in logic.”
Steam review · 2.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“90 minutes for $12.00 (since you have to have 2 copies of the game) is steep.”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“it was more like playing through the game with half a walkthrough while your counterpart has the other half.”
Steam review · 2.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 negative reviews
“Player 1 is bugged: There's a part where you need to enter a date into a calendar, and I'm only occasionally able to successfully click one of the dates.”
Steam review · 0.8 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Varied, themed rooms and items
− Lag and poor optimization
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Hilarious meta humor and game parody
− Humor and writing wear thin, cringey
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Creative, funny concept and levels
− Boring, obtuse or too-simple puzzles
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Memorable, lovable characters
− Repetitive fetch-quest gameplay
analyzed 3 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click