Co-op through the whole story
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“You can play the entire campaign in 2 player cooperative and both characters are represented fully throughout.”
Steam review · 40.2 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$44.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 5 h ago
A charming, tactical Pokémon-style creature collector with great co-op, but grindy, always-online and abandoned by its devs. Skip it if you want offline play or new content.
Great for
Pokémon fans who want strategic 2v2 battles and a co-op story run with a friend, ideally bought on sale
Main risk
Always-online servers, heavy grinding and abandonment can lock you out or burn you out
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“You can play the entire campaign in 2 player cooperative and both characters are represented fully throughout.”
Steam review · 40.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“I adore the creature designs and the artstyle in general!”
Steam review · 99.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“Temtem brings a level of Strategy and planning to the game that Nintendo hasn't even considered yet.”
Steam review · 228.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“the battle system has no rng (except for captures). No miss chance or crits makes it very strategic.”
Steam review · 60 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 positive reviews
“It's probably got 100 hours of content.”
Steam review · 263.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 30 positive reviews
“You have the option to play a randomized playthrough, a nuzlocke, or a randomized nuzlocke, all on dedicated servers”
Steam review · 97.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“the game has been effectively and fully abandoned by devs. No new content, releases, barely any bug fixes, nothing.”
Steam review · 122.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“It is way more grindy than any other creature collector I've played, including old-school Pokemon.”
Steam review · 203.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“Server inaccessible almost every time I try to play even though the servers are up and running.”
Steam review · 2.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“Always online. So you cant play on steam deck.. fuxking stupid”
Steam review · 1.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 negative reviews
“TemTem is such a clone of Pokemon that it neither stands out from nor improves upon it.”
Steam review · 2.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 negative reviews
“You can obtain quests that you literally don't have the means to complete”
Steam review · 26.4 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Generous free-to-play progression
− Feels pay-to-win, gacha and duplicate talents
analyzed 9 d ago

+ Deep team-building and synergies
− Brutal late-game difficulty spikes
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Moving, tearjerking story
− Combat isn't truly turn-based
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Faithful to classic X-COM
− Unfair-feeling combat and cheating AI
analyzed 4 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click