Challenging, rewarding difficulty
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“Difficult. Very difficult. But once you learn how to construct your base, the pain gives way to satisfaction.”
Steam review · 81.8 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A brutal, tense zombie-swarm RTS/tower-defense hybrid with a superb survival mode, but forced ironman, no saves and a tedious campaign. Skip it if you hate losing hours to one mistake.
Great for
Patient, masochistic RTS/tower-defense fans who love turtling, careful planning and replaying survival mode
Main risk
One missed zombie wipes hours of progress with no save or reload option
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“Difficult. Very difficult. But once you learn how to construct your base, the pain gives way to satisfaction.”
Steam review · 81.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“replay value is absolutely through the roof.”
Steam review · 2574.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“It feels really good to see absurdly numerous monsters dashing themselves against my carefully efficient defenses.”
Steam review · 526.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“Survival mode in this game is GOATED.”
Steam review · 169.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“Great visuals and art style, sound track, gameplay, and tech progression.”
Steam review · 179.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“lets you issue commands when paused so dont need quick response times”
Steam review · 68.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“It is not fun to slowly build up for an hour just to have you base destroyed over a single zombie slipping by.”
Steam review · 31.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“If you miss at least 1 zombie and let him attack any of your building, the game is essentially over, your CC will be destroyed in ~30 seconds.”
Steam review · 6.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“Each campaign level takes forever and not because of interesting gameplay or challenge.”
Steam review · 9.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“But for some reason they decided to include mandatory pixel hunt mini-game levels that have nothing to do with the core gameplay.”
Steam review · 326.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“Full of bugs and crashes all the time. Also it deletes my saved games making it impossible to ever finish the campaign.”
Steam review · 319.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“I got soft-locked on like the 7th mission because I didn't unlock specific things in a very overwhelming and poorly explained skill tree.”
Steam review · 26.4 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Unique, asymmetric civilizations
− Crashes and instability after updates
analyzed 3 h ago

+ Great blend of roguelite combat and cult management
− Shallow, mediocre combat and management
analyzed 4 h ago

+ Nostalgic childhood classic
− Multiplayer dead or broken
analyzed 4 h ago

+ Relaxing casual time-killer
− Aggressive monetization and paywalled seasons
analyzed 5 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click