Great writing, story and companions
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“One of the biggest highlights for me was definitely the companions.”
Steam review · 191.7 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A huge, deep, tabletop-faithful Pathfinder CRPG with excellent writing and companions, but punishing balance, hidden timers and a disliked kingdom system. Skip it if you want hand-holding or a casual pace.
Great for
Pathfinder/D&D fans who love deep builds, long stories and lots of reading, and don't mind guides or mods
Main risk
Opaque systems, hidden timers and unfair difficulty spikes can wreck a run or burn you out
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“One of the biggest highlights for me was definitely the companions.”
Steam review · 191.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“the monstrously deep character progression. You can build literally anyone, from a classic paladin to a mad alchemist”
Steam review · 80.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“And I love, love the possibility to play as an evil dude. People react to your choices, and game changes.”
Steam review · 353.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“closest thing to pen and paper RPG I've ever played.”
Steam review · 11.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“MOST content: 200+ hours to complete a single run. That's massive.”
Steam review · 232 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“It has a turn based mode to allow you to plan out each attack. At the same time it has a live action combat mode”
Steam review · 3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“every encounter is "do it perfect" or you die, that makes for a very boring game.”
Steam review · 32.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“I couldn't design a more tedious and cumbersome gameplay element even if I tried”
Steam review · 14.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“the game does not teach you how to manage your kingdom, meaning you can set yourself up for failure early in playthrough”
Steam review · 170.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“110 hours into a play though and have encountered a game breaking bug which means I am unable to complete the game.”
Steam review · 110.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“The infamous House at the Edge of Time. Left me with no choice but to quit the game.”
Steam review · 124.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“instead of playing you make camp again and again”
Steam review · translated · 15.4 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Pals as workers and base building
− Late-game grind
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Striking Soviet retro-futurist atmosphere
− Annoying protagonist and weak dialogue
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Best space 4X on the market
− DLC overpriced and essential
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Excellent story and characters
− Still buggy and unpolished
analyzed 2 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click