Huge Workshop mod scene
Mentioned in ~1 in 2 positive reviews
“The game is a love letter to any mod user.”
Steam review · 445.4 h played ↗
Ravenfield
Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Overwhelmingly PositiveOverwhelmingly Positive · 97%SteelRaven72017FPS · Shooter · Sandbox
The verdict
A moddable single-player Battlefield-style sandbox that shines thanks to Workshop content. Skip it if you want a deep base game, smart AI, or official multiplayer.
Great for
Players who like offline bot battles and loading Workshop mods for any era or theme
Main risk
Base game is thin and AI is poor, so the fun depends on mods
What players love
Fun, chaotic large-scale bot battles
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“It's simple, chaotic, and just pure fun.”
Steam review · 2 h played ↗
Runs well on low-end PCs
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“Runs on a potato, runs on a god pc”
Steam review · 75.3 h played ↗
Highly replayable offline sandbox
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“great fully offline and the sheer amount of mods makes replayability infinite.”
Steam review · 10.4 h played ↗
Cheap and good value
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“priced well, runs great, amazing all around!”
Steam review · 48.4 h played ↗
What players complain about
Poor, inconsistent AI
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“the enemy ai is cordinated and effecient while the friendly ai is neither.”
Steam review · 15.2 h played ↗
Slow development, endless early access
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“For a game that's been in development for nearly 10 years now, you'd expect a more complete game than just a handful of maps, weapons, and an unpolished "arcade mode"”
Steam review · 187.2 h played ↗
Arcade/campaign mode unbalanced and random
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“The enemy side gets multiple weapons, and vehicle drops each round, while we're only allowed to pick 1 kind of drop each round.”
Steam review · 45.7 h played ↗
Vanilla game is barebones and boring
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“Grossly unfinished and requires a heap of mods to get an experience that is only somewhat playable”
Steam review · 5.8 h played ↗
Poor optimization, especially with mods
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“Game optimization with mods its hell.”
Steam review · 0.8 h played ↗
No official multiplayer
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 negative reviews
“Until such a time as this Developer stops being so self-destructively stubborn about not adding Multiplayer to his game, I cannot in good conscience recommend this game”
Steam review · 19.6 h played ↗
System requirements
From the Steam store page
Steam Deck: Playable1 GB
Minimum
OSWindows 7 SP1
Processor32-bit, 2 GHz or Faster
Memory4 GB RAM
GraphicsIntel HD 4000
Storage1 GB available space
Recommended
OSWindows 10 or Newer
Processor64-bit, 3 GHz or Faster
Memory8 GB RAM
GraphicsGeforce GTX 750
Storage1 GB available space
OSWindows 7 SP1
Processor32-bit, 2 GHz or Faster
Memory4 GB RAM
GraphicsIntel HD 4000
Storage1 GB available space
More games to check
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
Cyberpunk 2077
Very Positive · 88%+ Excellent story and characters
− Still buggy and unpolished
analyzed 2 d ago
Atomic Heart
Very Positive · 82%+ Striking Soviet retro-futurist atmosphere
− Annoying protagonist and weak dialogue
analyzed 2 d ago
Aimlabs
Mostly Positive · 78%+ Noticeably improves aim
− Paywalls and subscription pushed everywhere
analyzed 2 d ago
Bodycam
Very Positive · 81%+ Photorealistic graphics and immersion
− Matchmaking, party play and P2P servers broken
analyzed 2 d ago
Weekly digest
Fresh games worth a look, in your inbox
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click