while True: learn()

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.

Very Positive · 91%Very Positive · 91%2019

$12.99

US Steam price, checked 1 h ago

The verdict

A cute, relaxing node-wiring sorting puzzle with an ML-history theme and plenty of cat charm. Skip it if you want real programming, deep ML teaching, or tight deterministic puzzles.

Great for

Curious beginners wanting a cozy, cat-filled logic puzzle with a light intro to machine learning

Main risk

Expecting a real programming or ML teaching game and getting repetitive shape-sorting with RNG quirks

What players love

Approachable intro to ML concepts and history

Mentioned in ~1 in 2 positive reviews

“it will teach you about neural networks and ML in a super fun and easy way”
Steam review · 1.6 h played ↗

“I think that this is a very good introduction to machine learning concepts.”
Steam review · 4.1 h played ↗

“A great game for a basic understanding of how algorithms work.”
Steam review · translated · 28.8 h played ↗

Fun, satisfying logic puzzles

Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews

“the triumph I feel when something works is peak and that's all I want out of a game.”
Steam review · 6.1 h played ↗

“The game is not hard, cute and very addictive, and short so it won't get boring.”
Steam review · translated · 9.7 h played ↗

Cute cat theme, art and humor

Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews

“Cute little cozy logic game, with an abundance of cat puns!”
Steam review · 4.5 h played ↗

“Lovely puzzle game, if you like Shapez but would like some extra cosy graphics, I'd recommend this!”
Steam review · 2.5 h played ↗

Links to real articles and courses

Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews

“especially the reading reference is really useful!!!”
Steam review · 4.2 h played ↗

“It has educational value aswell with real articles you can read and videos you can watch.”
Steam review · 0.5 h played ↗

Relaxing and cozy to play

Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews

“it's slow and great for relaxing in the evening while solving puzzles”
Steam review · 41.8 h played ↗

“A meditative game; even after a hard workday you sit down and meditate.”
Steam review · translated · 5.2 h played ↗

What players complain about

Not a programming or real ML game

Mentioned in ~3 in 5 negative reviews

“The programming in this game is only present in its theme. You will not learn anything about machine-learning, programming, or algorithms.”
Steam review · 7 h played ↗

“"training" is just an animation that plays and reduces error rather than you having to apply machine learning concepts”
Steam review · 1.1 h played ↗

“There is no machine learning here. It's a game about sorting geometric shapes, with links to the English wiki.”
Steam review · translated · 2.5 h played ↗

Repetitive sorting puzzles

Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews

“It’s just a bunch of load balancing puzzles where you try to filter and distribute colors, shapes and other pieces of data to satisfy the requirements on a bunch of outputs. Over and over again.”
Steam review · 2.9 h played ↗

“most of which are 'sort N shapes of different color and form into M outputs' for the 50th time”
Steam review · translated · 9.9 h played ↗

Clunky UI and bugs

Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews

“the rorex company task is broke at the moment, as there is not enough data.”
Steam review · 4.1 h played ↗

“Often crashes without saving progress (very often)”
Steam review · translated · 31.2 h played ↗

Poor explanations and unclear mechanics

Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews

“Tutorial and scenario instructions are absolutely abysmal.”
Steam review · 0.4 h played ↗

“Startups - Nobody knows how they work, the game gives you no relevant tools or statistics to figure out how well your solution is going to do.”
Steam review · 8 h played ↗

RNG makes solutions unreliable

Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews

“You can run the model, see where the inputs go, and then make a minor tweak only to find the distribution is totally skewed.”
Steam review · 6.6 h played ↗

“There is randomness everywhere, constantly. So logic goes out the window!”
Steam review · translated · 1.2 h played ↗

Gold medals gated behind upgrades

Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews

“needing to buy upgrades that are just speed boosts in order to get gold medals rather than them being purely based on how elegant/efficient your solution is”
Steam review · 1.4 h played ↗

System requirements

From the Steam store page

Steam Deck: Verified

Minimum

OSWindows 10 / 11

Processor2.0 GHz

Memory2 GB RAM

GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 3000

Storage500 MB available space

OSWindows 10 / 11

Processor2.0 GHz

Memory2 GB RAM

GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 3000

Storage500 MB available space

More games to check

Other games we’ve read the reviews for

See all →

Disney/Pixar Toy Story 3 Complete Edition

Very Positive · 84%

+ Strong nostalgia and charm

− Many bugs and softlocks

analyzed 9 d ago

Tower Unite

Very Positive · 90%

+ Huge variety of minigames and activities

− Toxic community and NSFW condos

analyzed 3 d ago

−20%

Groundwork Simulator

Mixed · 49%

+ Great potential and forgiving early-access view

− Overpriced and too rough for early access

analyzed 3 d ago

SpaceEngine

Overwhelmingly Positive

+ Immense, seamless, realistic universe

− Crashes, bugs and failure to launch

analyzed 4 d ago

Weekly digest

Fresh games worth a look, in your inbox

The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.

One email a week · unsubscribe in one click