Great co-op with friends
Mentioned in ~1 in 2 positive reviews
“Definitely meant for multiplayer, likely would not be much fun solo but is fantastic with a group.”
Steam review · 107.7 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A charming D&D-style turn-based roguelike that shines in 3-player co-op. Heavy RNG and harsh scaling frustrate many, so skip it if luck-driven losses annoy you.
Great for
Groups of 2-3 friends who like tabletop RPGs and can laugh off bad dice luck
Main risk
Brutal RNG and enemy scaling can wipe hours-long runs, making losses feel unfair
29 recent reviews
Recent negative reviews mostly repeat RNG and balance complaints, plus a few about missing tutorial and connection errors. No single new patch or bug is clearly identified.
29 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 2 positive reviews
“Definitely meant for multiplayer, likely would not be much fun solo but is fantastic with a group.”
Steam review · 107.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“If you've ever wanted something that captures the feeling of a Dungeons & Dragons campaign without needing a Dungeon Master, this is about as close as it gets.”
Steam review · 9.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“There's a lot of content and replayability.”
Steam review · 43.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“Brutally hard, totally unfair, and completely impossible to put down.”
Steam review · 30.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“It's very nice to have a turn based game that you can pick up and put down so easily”
Steam review · 175.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 positive reviews
“The art direction is so delightful”
Steam review · 227.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“this game is RNG all the way through, with very little player agency.”
Steam review · 54.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“Enemies outscale you to the point that fights are mathematically unwinnable within 5-10 hours of most runs”
Steam review · 51.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“it doesn't tutorial well, and it doesn't play like the things I'm familiar with in the genre.”
Steam review · 0.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“As the game progresses, the prices of all items —including healing items— increase exponentially.”
Steam review · 66.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“The servers are worse than Roblox, constant crashes and 'disconnect by client host user'.”
Steam review · translated · 9.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“9 hours spent on a run only to then die in seconds due to rng is laughable”
Steam review · 14.3 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Fun co-op multiplayer
− Overtuned enemies and unfair difficulty
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Addictive mine-then-defend loop
− Repetitive and shallow over time
analyzed 20 min ago

+ Runs well and is well optimized
− No key rebinding; controller effectively required
analyzed 1 h ago

+ Huge variety of weapons and builds
− Undisclosed generative AI art
analyzed 7 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click