No RNG, pure skill
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“no randomness, no card packs, no grinding, and absolutely no pay‑to‑win, so the only thing you can blame for losing is your own brain.”
Steam review · 10 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 263 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 263 Steam reviews actually say.
Free to play
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 6 h ago
A deep, free, no-luck turn-based strategy game mixing RTS economy with card-style units. Skip it if you want casual play, a finished campaign, or a busy player base.
Great for
Players who love chess-like, calculation-heavy strategy with zero luck, and who enjoy bots or friends
Main risk
Abandoned by the developers, with an unfinished paid campaign and very few players to match against
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“no randomness, no card packs, no grinding, and absolutely no pay‑to‑win, so the only thing you can blame for losing is your own brain.”
Steam review · 10 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“There is no skill ceiling; you will always play better if you apply more thought.”
Steam review · 224.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“All units are unlocked from the start, no grind, no nonsense.”
Steam review · 17.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“the AI is great and it has good features for learning like being able to roll back turns and sets of puzzles to teach concepts.”
Steam review · 46.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 38 positive reviews
“The actions are quick and responsive, being able to undo anything quickly during your turn is amazing”
Steam review · 9.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Only the first chapter of the solo campaign is free and the rest of it is hidden behind a paywall.”
Steam review · 4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“The experience is purely mechanical with no excitement whatsoever”
Steam review · 2.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“Less like a game and more like a math problem to solve.”
Steam review · 2.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“it has been officially abandoned by the developers, while the servers are still running, there are no plans to finish the remaining campaign chapters which were promised and which some people, including me, paid for.”
Steam review · 5.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“the almost utter lack of low level players means the queues are long and the opponents are almost always far better than you.”
Steam review · 11.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 negative reviews
“You either run the meta, read straight from the guide, or you lose.”
Steam review · 19.8 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Strong writing, characters and worldbuilding
− Shallow, repetitive card gameplay
analyzed 5 d ago

+ Generous free-to-play progression
− Feels pay-to-win, gacha and duplicate talents
analyzed 9 d ago

+ Gorgeous pixel art and animation
− Pay-to-win and expensive cards
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Excellent for learning Magic
− Aggressive monetization and paywalled sealed slots
analyzed 4 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click