Free and not pay-to-win
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Game is balanced, no p2w wall, just play a bit, unlock some cards, shards, get hero you want and build deck using cards and shards.”
Steam review · 16.9 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Free to play
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 6 h ago
A fast, deep and fair free-to-play card/tower-defense hybrid, but it has stagnated, is full of bots, and crashes. Skip it if you want fresh content or a big player base.
Great for
Players who want quick 1v1 or 2v2 deckbuilding matches for free, solo or with a friend
Main risk
No new content, few real players (lots of bots), plus crashes and a stale meta
21 recent reviews
Recent negative reviews mention ongoing crashing, the developers' use of AI in their new game, and cheaters. Evidence is thin, so we're only moderately sure.
21 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Game is balanced, no p2w wall, just play a bit, unlock some cards, shards, get hero you want and build deck using cards and shards.”
Steam review · 16.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Fast paced, short matches. Perfect for casually playing after work.”
Steam review · 1026.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“fun and deep 1v1 or 2v2 rock paper scissors card game with surprisingly deep strategy in the deck building.”
Steam review · 50.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“Better clash royale and better game play like you need to hold bridges for XP to unlock passive abilities”
Steam review · 1.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“A very fun game with hundreds of hours to play, even better with friends. Highly recommended.”
Steam review · 31 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Game crashes on a regular basis after a match”
Steam review · 12.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“people only playing same meta decks, u see same cards every fight, no more individuell thoughts on decks..”
Steam review · 105.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“its just pay to win.”
Steam review · 12.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“There has been no new content in a long time now where as we had new cards being added every few months before.”
Steam review · 653.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ game with no moderation and griefers everywhere.”
Steam review · 3479.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“99% of matches are just bots and even when you get an actual player you either roll them or they roll you with no inbetween.”
Steam review · 38.2 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ First-person aiming removes hit-chance RNG
− Bugs, softlocks and crashes
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Deep team-building and synergies
− Brutal late-game difficulty spikes
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Chess-like prediction tactics
− Clunky, fiddly UI and controls
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Faithful to classic X-COM
− Unfair-feeling combat and cheating AI
analyzed 4 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click