Funny writing and good voice acting
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“quickly pulls you in with its humor, charming characters and constant sense of progress”
Steam review · 376.8 h played ↗
Crush Crush
Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Very Positive · 89%Very Positive · 89%Sad Panda Studios2016Dating Sim · Incremental · Visual Novel
The verdict
A free idle-clicker dating sim with cute, voiced girls and good humor, but very slow progression and heavy monetization. Skip it if you hate grinding, timers or paywalls.
Great for
Idle-game fans who want cute anime girls, humor and a relaxed daily check-in routine
Main risk
Progress slows to a crawl and pushes you to pay or cheat
What players love
Lots of ongoing content and events
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“there’s a surprising amount of content here”
Steam review · 1.6 h played ↗
Huge cast of cute, varied girls
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 positive reviews
“If you have a fetish, they are no shortage of girls that may tickle your fancy.”
Steam review · 4666.2 h played ↗
Relaxing, easy-to-dip-into idle gameplay
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 positive reviews
“i love how you can js go offline and its still making money for youu!”
Steam review · 4.4 h played ↗
What players complain about
Pay-to-win monetization and paywalls
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“as it currently stands the game is effectively [b]paywalled[/b].”
Steam review · 123.5 h played ↗
Extremely slow, grindy progression
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“I'm literally waiting days for a hobby to level up one single time”
Steam review · 415.5 h played ↗
Boring, repetitive clicking and waiting
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“eventually it becomes boring and it's all waiting.”
Steam review · 17.8 h played ↗
Events and old content now paid or FOMO
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“events that were free are now having to be paid for ($7) to get now”
Steam review · 1153 h played ↗
Generative AI in advertising
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 negative reviews
“Long time player and multiple purchases but will no longer play as long as they support the use of generative ai.”
Steam review · 288.8 h played ↗
Capped reset bonus makes resets pointless
Mentioned in ~1 in 30 negative reviews
“WHY IS THERE A LIMIT FOR REBIRTHS????”
Steam review · 276.2 h played ↗
System requirements
From the Steam store page
Steam Deck: Playable2 GB
Minimum
OSWindows 10, Windows 11
ProcessorModern Intel/AMD CPU 1.6GHz+
Memory2 GB RAM
GraphicsGraphics card with DX10 capabilities. Anything made since 2009 should work.
Storage2 GB available space
Recommended
OSWindows 10, Windows 11
ProcessorModern Intel/AMD CPU 2GHz+
Memory4 GB RAM
GraphicsGraphics card with DX10 capabilities. Anything made since 2009 should work.
Storage2 GB available space
OSWindows 10, Windows 11
ProcessorModern Intel/AMD CPU 1.6GHz+
Memory2 GB RAM
GraphicsGraphics card with DX10 capabilities. Anything made since 2009 should work.
Storage2 GB available space
More games to check
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
Mirror
Overwhelmingly Positive+ Fun match-3 with RPG depth
− Censored by default, no official uncensor
analyzed 1 d ago
Soundpad
Overwhelmingly Positive+ Hilarious for trolling friends
− Doesn't work or very hard to configure
analyzed 1 d ago
Helltaker
Very Positive · 99%+ Free and short, perfect length
− Unfair, frustrating bullet-hell bosses
analyzed 1 d ago
Doki Doki Literature Club!
Very Positive · 98%+ Shocking plot twist, best played blind
− Boring, slow start with lots of reading
analyzed 2 d ago
Weekly digest
Fresh games worth a look, in your inbox
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click