Generous free-to-play economy
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Actually free to play, not free to grind.”
Steam review · 103.8 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A fast, anime-styled Hearthstone-like CCG with great art, a strong story mode and generous free packs, but the service has ended and the servers are shut down. Don't buy it expecting to play.
Great for
Nobody new, since it is offline; fans can still look back on its story, art and fast card play
Main risk
The game is permanently shut down (end of service), so it is unplayable
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Actually free to play, not free to grind.”
Steam review · 103.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Evolve is a game-changing, tempo-gaining mechanic that seems simple at first but has quite a bit of depth.”
Steam review · 18.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“This game is better than its sequel in every way”
Steam review · 3760.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Shadowverse's story mode is for lack of a better word incredible and I would say its worth downloading Shadowverse just to play it.”
Steam review · 144.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Great artworks, visuals, and animations.”
Steam review · 19.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“This iteration of the game even had collabs with IPs like Nier Automata, Fate/Stay Night UBW, Re:Zero, and more!”
Steam review · 946.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“All cards got powercreeped so hard it reached a point where balance has been thrown out of the window.”
Steam review · 3423 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“If you enjoy being dead by turn 5 this is the game for you.”
Steam review · 104.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“It's a brain dead decision in my opinion to shut down the more successful first game just because you want to force people to finally try your second game”
Steam review · 417.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“you have to either grind endlessly or pay a hell lot to earn a meta deck, which is a must for you could possibly win.”
Steam review · 259 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“it download the data into the AppData in your C drive, and you can't change it. And, all of that data DOESN'T DELETE ITSELF when you UNINSTALL the GAME.”
Steam review · 4.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 negative reviews
“Ever spent money on a game, then got banned without any specific reason and then hit your head on a wall repeatedly to a wall named "customer support" to no avail?”
Steam review · 747.1 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Go in blind: constant surprises and twists
− Acts 2 and 3 are a big step down from Act 1
analyzed 20 h ago

+ Extremely addictive 'one more run' loop
− Too reliant on RNG
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Generous free-to-play economy
− Overpowered meta, power creep and bad banlist
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Excellent story and characters
− Still buggy and unpolished
analyzed 2 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click