Fast, short matches
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“Its quicker and less drawn out the the regular WOT game.”
Steam review · 111.8 h played ↗
World of Tanks Blitz
Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Mostly Positive · 75%Mostly Positive · 75%Wargaming Group Limited2016Shooter · FPS · Action
The verdict
A fast, simple 7v7 tank game that runs on weak hardware and suits short sessions. Skip it if aggressive monetization, bots, random hits and uneven matchmaking will bother you.
Great for
Casual players wanting short tank matches on a weak PC, especially WoT fans
Main risk
Heavy monetization, bots and unbalanced matchmaking make it feel like a pay-to-win cash grab
What players love
Large variety of tanks and tech trees
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“Very fun a lot of cool tanks you can choose from and play.”
Steam review · 46 h played ↗
Runs well on weak hardware
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“Nice fast paced game, perfect for lovers of wot with weak pc”
Steam review · 481.6 h played ↗
Good as a simpler WoT alternative
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 positive reviews
“great game! much more fun than the regular WOT”
Steam review · 1031.2 h played ↗
Events, rewards and free progress
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 positive reviews
“The events, challenges, missions, rewards, etc, are routinely updated and keep the game fresh.”
Steam review · 1121.6 h played ↗
Fun, tactical core gameplay
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“each one handles differently so it feels strategic”
Steam review · 41 h played ↗
What players complain about
Aggressive monetization and pay-to-win
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“No matter how much you play, it is extremely difficult to progress without spending money.”
Steam review · 1074.8 h played ↗
Unbalanced matchmaking and random outcomes
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“You either get a turbo win or a turbo loss, very few normal battles.”
Steam review · translated from Russian · 1123.4 h played ↗
Bots and bad teammates
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“The BOTS: they just ruin the game.”
Steam review · 2322.2 h played ↗
Connection issues, crashes and freezes
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“playing through the Steam client the game crashes on map load, crashes again on re-entry, until the battle ends.”
Steam review · translated from Russian · 1085.3 h played ↗
Loot boxes and gambling mechanics
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“now it has turned into a casino.”
Steam review · 474.5 h played ↗
Popup offers spam the garage
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 negative reviews
“Everytime opening the game it always show limited time offers that block the entire screen”
Steam review · 346.7 h played ↗
System requirements
From the Steam store page
Steam Deck: Playable8 GB
Minimum
OSWindows 7, 8.0, 8.1, 10, 11
Processor2 GHz
Memory2 GB RAM
GraphicsDirectX 11 compliant graphics card with 256 MB of VRAM
Storage8 GB available space
OSWindows 7, 8.0, 8.1, 10, 11
Processor2 GHz
Memory2 GB RAM
GraphicsDirectX 11 compliant graphics card with 256 MB of VRAM
Storage8 GB available space
More games to check
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
Bodycam
Very Positive · 81%+ Photorealistic graphics and immersion
− Matchmaking, party play and P2P servers broken
analyzed 14 h ago
Apex Legends™
Mostly Positive · 75%+ Fast, intense, high-skill, addictive loop
− Rampant cheaters and weak anti-cheat
analyzed 14 h ago
Counter-Strike: Condition Zero
Very Positive · 92%+ Only single-player Counter-Strike campaign
− Dumb yet aimbot-like enemy AI
analyzed 2 h ago
Arena Breakout: Infinite
Mostly Positive · 74%+ Free, casual-friendly Tarkov alternative
− Cheaters and weak anti-cheat
analyzed 2 h ago
Weekly digest
Fresh games worth a look, in your inbox
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click