Witty satirical story and humor
Mentioned in ~1 in 2 positive reviews
“its wrapped up in so much cute writing and context that taps into the sinister nature of number go up games as a genre”
Steam review · 5.1 h played ↗
Feed The Forest
Worth buying? What 54 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 54 Steam reviews actually say.
Very Positive · 93%Very Positive · 93%Indoor Sunglasses2026Incremental · Idler · Economy
−25%$7.99$5.99
US Steam price, checked 2 h ago
Early verdict·54 reviews so far·we’ll re-check within 3 days
Get an email when the full verdict is in
One email when we’ve read enough reviews, nothing else
The verdict
A short, charming incremental with witty dark satire about greed and capitalism, finishable in about 4 hours. Skip it if you want long replayable content or dislike political commentary.
Great for
Fans of number-go-up incrementals who enjoy cute visuals, dark humor and a short, story-driven experience
Main risk
It's only about 4 hours long with little replayability, and some find it repetitive or politically preachy
What players love
Fun, satisfying incremental progression
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Progression is fun and does not feel like work, unlike some incrementals.”
Steam review · 4.3 h played ↗
Worth the price for a short game
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“4-5 hours of active play for the price, I felt like I got my money's worth.”
Steam review · 4.5 h played ↗
Cute visuals, music and audio
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Music and graphics are made with care.”
Steam review · 4.3 h played ↗
Relaxing and chill
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“If you need a game to relax after a long day and listen to some bloop-bloop-bloooop, this is it!”
Steam review · 1.5 h played ↗
Runs well on low-end hardware
Mentioned in ~1 in 49 positive reviews
“Game runs fairly well on my older intel integrated graphics laptop, so should run on basically anything.”
Steam review · 4 h played ↗
What players complain about
Very short with little replayability
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“its a 4 hour game.”
Steam review · 4.9 h played ↗
Heavy-handed political messaging
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“too political (I don't care about your opinions)”
Steam review · 3.3 h played ↗
Dull, repetitive grind
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“this one is just a dull and boring grind with no real reward or pay off at the end.”
Steam review · 3.9 h played ↗
Dark, jarring ending
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“The game started out cute and ended in some crazy mess with sacrifices.”
Steam review · translated · 4.8 h played ↗
System requirements
From the Steam store page
Steam Deck: UnknownController support1 GB
Minimum
OSWindows 10
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 5 2600
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Storage1 GB available space
OSWindows 10
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 5 2600
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Storage1 GB available space
More games to check
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
−10%
Can 'Em All
Overwhelmingly Positive
+ Addictive, satisfying progression loop
− Repetitive and boring over time
analyzed 3 h ago
Fuck the Ocean
Very Positive · 86%Early verdict
+ Funny writing and silly premise
− Full resets each level undo progress
analyzed 2 h ago
−20%
Monster Hatcher
Mostly Positive · 77%Early verdict
+ Addictive 'one more' progression
− Grindy, repetitive, no real ending
analyzed 2 h ago
−30%
Incremental Traffic
Very Positive · 90%Early verdict
+ Addictive, satisfying traffic-fixing loop
− Looks AI-generated
analyzed 2 h ago
Weekly digest
Fresh games worth a look, in your inbox
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click