Hardcore, rewarding survival challenge
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“This is a slow-paced hardcore survival game. If that sounds fun to you, then this game is a must-have!”
Steam review · 63.2 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$13.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 2 h ago
A brutal, grindy solo-dev survival sandbox with lovely scenery and co-op, now tunable with mods. Skip it if you hate RNG loot-box scavenging and constant dying.
Great for
Patient players who like hardcore, grindy survival, solo or co-op, and enjoy tweaking things with mods
Main risk
The early game: RNG loot-box hunting, predators everywhere and far-off respawns mean constant deaths.
64 recent reviews
Recent negative reviews mostly come from new buyers hitting the loot-box grind, predator density and far respawns, and complain about 10 years of early access. Mod support softens this, but the cause of the dip is not certain.
64 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“This is a slow-paced hardcore survival game. If that sounds fun to you, then this game is a must-have!”
Steam review · 63.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“With mods, I can finally tune that friction down without removing the actual survival loop.”
Steam review · 108.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Incredibly beautiful environment, you want to lick every second texture, even on my potato PC.”
Steam review · translated · 61.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“I got to watch this man actually listen to his community, add in things we actually WANTED like more armor, tools, farming, and craftables.”
Steam review · 150.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“One of my favourite things is still spending a couple of hours building on a server with other people”
Steam review · 138.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“Great game to play many times. Other survival games have an end then done.”
Steam review · 147.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“There seemed to be a pack of wolves, bears, or other predators every few feet in the forest, so we spent more time running and dying than actually building anything.”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“1 Wood = 1 plank, tell me how that works? 11 fiber to make 1 cordage, good luck grinding.”
Steam review · 48.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“There is no "do X to get X material" in the early game, you just wander around aimlessly hoping to get a lucky box/bag spawn and hope it has what you need.”
Steam review · 5.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Early access for over TEN YEARS?!? If you could look at the game 10 years ago and it today, you would hard pressed to be able to see a difference.”
Steam review · 27.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“I've played for 11 hours and 9 of those were spent travelling back to my body.”
Steam review · 11.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“10 years of development and wolves run under water, not swim, run under water to come kill you.”
Steam review · 0.6 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Fun flying and exploration
− Many bugs and progression soft-locks
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Hilarious emergent stories and roleplay
− Abandoned by developers
analyzed 37 min ago

+ Immersive alien-planet atmosphere
− Abandoned and unfinished
analyzed 2 h ago

+ Stunning visuals and atmosphere
− Abandoned or on hold, no updates
analyzed 23 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click