Engaging story and characters
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“The ending genuinely had me tearing up with joy”
Steam review · 24.2 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A refined, fun sequel with great atmosphere and combat, but the PC remaster crashes constantly and has little autosave. Skip it if you can't tolerate crashes; consider the original version.
Great for
Fans of the first BioShock who want smoother combat as a Big Daddy and will save often or use a crash-fix mod
Main risk
Frequent random crashes with sparse autosaves can cost hours of progress
99 recent reviews
Recent positive reviewers praise gameplay and story and often cite the Nexus crash-fix mod or frequent saving as workarounds. Crashes still dominate recent negatives, so the improvement looks like players coping rather than an official fix.
99 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“The ending genuinely had me tearing up with joy”
Steam review · 24.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“They fixed my biggest issue with the first game- that you couldn't use your guns and plasmids at once”
Steam review · 32.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Rapture is still an amazing setting, with incredible atmosphere, lots of detail, and a great soundtrack.”
Steam review · 11 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“whoever came up with the idea of a playable big daddy in the sequel is the goat”
Steam review · 11 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 positive reviews
“Minerva's Den is also a fantastic DLC. Despite its relatively short length, it delivers a surprisingly impactful story”
Steam review · 16.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“The remove of the tedious pipe puzzle is definitely a great point to me.”
Steam review · 16.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~4 in 5 negative reviews
“Crashes a lot. In fact, I can't even finish the game, because the last part consistently crashes in the ONE part of the game you can't quicksave.”
Steam review · 45 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“for some reason this remaster doesn't have auto save. I lost 2 hours of time because of it.”
Steam review · 12.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“This remaster also does the bare minimum. No modern auto-saving and it sometimes has glitchly text.”
Steam review · 19.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“The game is too alike to the first game. The enemies are reused. The areas are the same.”
Steam review · 12.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 negative reviews
“if you happen to be saving when it has a random seizure and crashes, it will delete your save file”
Steam review · 15.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 negative reviews
“Intentionally choking player's resources is just bad design choice.”
Steam review · 21.1 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Striking Soviet retro-futurist atmosphere
− Annoying protagonist and weak dialogue
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Excellent story and characters
− Still buggy and unpolished
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Noticeably improves aim
− Paywalls and subscription pushed everywhere
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Photorealistic graphics and immersion
− Matchmaking, party play and P2P servers broken
analyzed 1 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click