Simple, addictive time-killer
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Very good simple game. you just try to eat everyone else. that's it.”
Steam review · 3.3 h played ↗
Mitos.is: The Game
Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Very Positive · 83%Very Positive · 83%Freakinware Studios2015Survival · Strategy · Casual
The verdict
A free Agar.io-style blob-eating game with extra modes, skins and gear. It's a fun time-killer, but widely seen as pay-to-win and plagued by teamers, cheaters and bots.
Great for
Casual players wanting a simple, free Agar.io-style time-killer with friends and varied modes
Main risk
Pay-to-win gear plus teamers, cheaters and bots make it feel unfair and often not worth playing
What players love
Skins, gear and progression
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Importantly, you can earn currency in-game, so you can play comfortably without donating”
Steam review · translated · 8.8 h played ↗
Many game modes
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Many game modes”
Steam review · translated · 0.5 h played ↗
Good music and soundtrack
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“But the main thing: it has music!”
Steam review · translated · 4.5 h played ↗
Better than Agar.io
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“A magnificent clone. After it you don't want to go back to Agar.io.”
Steam review · translated · 1.3 h played ↗
Fun with friends and relaxing
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“Enjoyable experience. Competitive, but can be strangely relaxing.”
Steam review · 17.7 h played ↗
What players complain about
Pay-to-win gear and microtransactions
Mentioned in ~1 in 2 negative reviews
“Good if it weren't extremely pay to win.”
Steam review · 574.8 h played ↗
Just an Agar.io clone
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“But why, when there's the cult original?”
Steam review · translated · 53.3 h played ↗
Teamers in solo and free-for-all modes
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“Every lobby either has people teaming up (which the game says you should report but gives you no in game option to do so)”
Steam review · 2.7 h played ↗
Cheaters, hackers and weak moderation
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“The top spots are almost always cheaters, because there's no anti-cheat to catch them.”
Steam review · 102.8 h played ↗
Toxic community and bad developers
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“Awful community, you won't find more toxic people than in this game”
Steam review · translated · 45.3 h played ↗
Bots and tiny player base
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“now doesn't matter which minigame you play it'll be 80% bots and 20% players in the best case scenario”
Steam review · 508.7 h played ↗
System requirements
From the Steam store page
Steam Deck: PlayableController support
Minimum
OSWindows 7
Processor2.33GHz or faster x86-compatible processor
Memory512 MB RAM
OSWindows 7
Processor2.33GHz or faster x86-compatible processor
Memory512 MB RAM
More games to check
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
Palworld
Very Positive · 95%+ Pals as workers and base building
− Late-game grind
analyzed 2 d ago
Barotrauma
Very Positive · 94%+ Hilarious emergent chaos and stories
− Repetitive, boring gameplay loop
analyzed 45 min ago
State of Decay 2: Juggernaut Edition
Very Positive · 84%+ Community management with permadeath stakes
− Forced Xbox/Microsoft account login
analyzed 2 h ago
Dungeon Defenders II
Mixed · 68%+ Addictive loot grind and progression
− Aggressive monetization and paywalled heroes
analyzed 7 h ago
Weekly digest
Fresh games worth a look, in your inbox
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click