Beautiful pixel art and atmosphere
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“The pixel art of this game soon stands out, especially in the reflections of the water, which gives a nice look to the game.”
Steam review · 54.7 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A free, beautiful minimalist kingdom-defense game that's easy to start and addictive, but repetitive and held back by dumb AI and no explanations. Skip it if you want control or depth.
Great for
Players who want a cheap, relaxing pixel-art tower-defense and a taste of the Kingdom series
Main risk
Dumb unit AI and zero control plus no explanations cause frustrating losses and repetitive runs
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“The pixel art of this game soon stands out, especially in the reflections of the water, which gives a nice look to the game.”
Steam review · 54.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“The file size is small and it performs outstandingly well. especially on my older PCs.”
Steam review · 69.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Genious in its simplicity ! The game only uses left/right/down keys and you can do so much with it.”
Steam review · 10.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“it can also serve as a demo for the whole [url=store.steampowered.com/franchise/kingdom]Kingdom Series[/url] of games”
Steam review · 18.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Simple controls hide a surprisingly tense and rewarding kingdom-building experience.”
Steam review · 2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“I absolutely adore the music by Amos Roddy.”
Steam review · 20.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“Inconsistent bad AI that constantly breaks; you can have an army of like 100 archers and they'll decide to only defend one side of your castle”
Steam review · 21.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Just never been a fan of games that market the lack of explanation as a feature.”
Steam review · 3.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“you spent the majority of the time walking from one side of the map to the other”
Steam review · 32.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“Game is interesting, but plagued with terrible random levels that are unwinnable and bugs that break progression.”
Steam review · 10.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“Game is unplayable and freezes up after just ten or twenty minutes of playing.”
Steam review · 22.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 negative reviews
“Decades old game and they still haven't put in a cancel building button.”
Steam review · 5.6 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Nostalgic childhood classic
− Multiplayer dead or broken
analyzed 1 min ago

+ Relaxing casual time-killer
− Aggressive monetization and paywalled seasons
analyzed 1 h ago

+ Creative physics-based building
− Grindy, repetitive survival loop
analyzed 6 h ago

+ Satisfying exploration of varied planets
− Bugs that destroy items, vehicles and saves
analyzed 7 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click