Addictive Monopoly-meets-card-battler gameplay
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 positive reviews
“It's something like Monopoly meets Magic the Gathering/Pokemon in all the best of ways.”
Steam review · 0.3 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 44 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 44 Steam reviews actually say.
−10%$44.99$40.49
US Steam price, checked 2 h ago
Early verdict·44 reviews so far·we’ll re-check within 3 days
Get an email when the full verdict is in
One email when we’ve read enough reviews, nothing else
A faithful, polished Culdcept revival: Monopoly meets Magic-style card battling, with a new art style and working online play. Skip it if you need local multiplayer, dislike RNG, or balk at the $40 price.
Great for
Culdcept veterans and fans of board-game/card-game hybrids who play online
Main risk
No local multiplayer, luck-heavy simple play and thin content for a $40 price
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 positive reviews
“It's something like Monopoly meets Magic the Gathering/Pokemon in all the best of ways.”
Steam review · 0.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“my impression is that this is a good Culdcept. All the balance changes to individual cards as well as the general system make sense.”
Steam review · 17.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“the art and animations go so hard they had no right. Each weapon has its own little animation.”
Steam review · 2.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“Online play works well for the most part, I've had about ten matches including against overseas, most have worked flawlessly.”
Steam review · 17.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“The PC controls are great, unlike the previous PC culdcept game.”
Steam review · 1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“The game in general is much faster. You can control the speed of the game which is an improvement in my opinion.”
Steam review · 12.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“The lack of local multiplayer might ruin this game.”
Steam review · 18.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“Any strategic depth that might be hiding under the surface is mired in the luck of the dice/draw.”
Steam review · 3.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“The card art is very uninspiring, borderline garbage.”
Steam review · 0.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Very little content. I beat the game with minimal effort, making 3 total decks, in 10 hours. Definitely not worth 40 dollars.”
Steam review · 10.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Why the hell does this game have a tutorial if it doesn't explain shit?”
Steam review · 17.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“an hour of play is getting you maybe 4 cards you still need out of the 1600 cards you'd need to collect to have 4 of each.”
Steam review · 16.1 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Immersive, slow-paced hunting
− Poor performance and optimization
analyzed 2 h ago

+ Engaging gesture-based VR combat
− Free-to-play switch; MMO sold as DLC
analyzed 9 d ago

+ Emotional, philosophical meaning
− Boring and pointless
analyzed 11 d ago

+ Classic Sonic games in one package
− Performance problems, laggy menus and crashes
analyzed 11 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click