Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Free to play
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 2 h ago
A gorgeous, cozy open-world dress-up gacha with stunning outfits and a relaxing vibe. Skip it if you have a low-end PC or little disk space, dislike gacha spending, or want deep combat.
Great for
Fans of cozy dress-up, photo mode and open-world exploration who can save pulls patiently
Main risk
Heavy install and poor performance, plus gacha costs that make full 5-star outfits hard for free players
57 recent reviews
Recent positive reviewers say the game recovered after the 1.5 backlash, with better story, content and visuals. Recent negatives mostly cite performance and the Valko controversy. Moderate confidence.
57 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 positive reviews
“You can really tell they put love into every outfit, even the 3-star items (which you can now dye) have incredible detail, right down to the glitter.”
Steam review · 1209.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“an overall comfy and positive vibe that just pours from every aspect of the game”
Steam review · 451.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“The world is gorgeous, the outfits are amazing, and exploring Miraland never gets boring.”
Steam review · 306.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“majority of the stuff you can get for the currency you earn just by playing, there are no agressive incentives to point you to the store”
Steam review · 451.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“There are so many different things to do that it's hard to get bored.”
Steam review · 442.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“no demoralizing 50/50 losses, no fake endorphin from pulling another character who'll be power-crept in two months”
Steam review · translated · 172.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“in 2025 it ran smoothly on ultra quality! now it barely goes 5 seconds without lagging and freezing on low + preformance”
Steam review · 93 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“To get a full set you need at least 180-200 pulls which is insane”
Steam review · 11.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“What other live service game needs a full story retcon not even a year after release?”
Steam review · 125.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“It is beyond obvious that the studio ONLY cares about the Chinese player base.”
Steam review · 60.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“This game was around 30gb when it was released on steam, now it is over 100.”
Steam review · 1.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“The game doesn't fully close unless you remember to go into Task Manager and kill the process when you're done playing.”
Steam review · 91.6 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
+ Emotional, philosophical meaning
− Boring and pointless
analyzed 10 d ago
+ Relaxing, cozy, no-pressure play
− Buggy updates and unfixed bugs
analyzed 2 h ago
+ Relaxing, cozy and comforting
− Overpriced IAPs and aggressive FOMO
analyzed 2 h ago
+ Fun secrets and exploration
− Repetitive, slow pacing and weak upgrades
analyzed 2 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click