Worth buying? What 155 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 155 Steam reviews actually say.
$14.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 59 min ago
A charming, funny roguelite deckbuilder where you feed folklore monsters instead of fighting them. It's easy to learn but fairly light on depth and content, so veterans wanting a complex challenge may want to skip it.
Great for
Deckbuilder fans and newcomers who like folklore, humor, cozy vibes and food themes
Main risk
Shallow, repetitive deckbuilding with limited content that may bore veterans after a few hours
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“heaps of care and attention put into honouring ancient tales from the UK/Ireland (fae, creatures, monstrous beings etc) and traditional dishes (colcannon, toad in the hole etc.)”
Steam review · 17.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“There are some choice lines and an amazing amount of humor (both pop culture and otherwise) that doesn't ever miss it's mark and is actually genuinely funny”
Steam review · 12.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“An absolutely charming roguelite deckbuilder game with fantastic pixel graphics, fun writing, good music”
Steam review · 8.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“It's also a great starting point if you want to try jumping into the deckbuilding genre.”
Steam review · 1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“Ever feel bad for the monsters you slay in a roguelite? No killing necessary here! Feed them and they'll leave you alone.”
Steam review · 8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“What I like most is the cravings mechanic. Build long chains giving extra hunger points to feed the horrors faster.”
Steam review · 7.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~3 in 5 negative reviews
“make it feel repetitve after 3/4 hours of gameplay. Fun to try, impossible to finish without getting bored.”
Steam review · 5.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~3 in 5 negative reviews
“you often cook up a really good deck before starting a run and most cards you might add to it will make it worse.”
Steam review · 7.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Failure feels forced, not earned through player failure.”
Steam review · 3.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Difficulty now easy, considering grind was reduced and skill tree expanded with overpowered things.”
Steam review · 10.8 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
+ Gorgeous art and strong presentation
− Pay-to-win feel and aggressive monetization
analyzed 3 h ago
+ Deep, engaging and addictive card battler
− Difficulty feels unfair or poorly balanced
analyzed 4 h ago
+ All cards free, no pay-to-win
− Cash-grab, FOMO and NFT-style monetization
analyzed 1 d ago
+ Gorgeous pixel art and animation
− Pay-to-win and expensive cards
analyzed 9 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click