Timeless classic, still fun today
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Still as fun in 2026 as it was back in 2005. There are still active servers - you always have a few to choose from”
Steam review · 277.5 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A classic, simple team-based WW2 shooter with punchy gunplay and a loyal middle-aged community, but few servers. Skip it if you want a big player base, forgiving recoil or newcomer-friendly play.
Great for
Nostalgic players and fans of simple, objective-based team shooters without unlocks or progression
Main risk
Few populated servers, dominated by veterans and strict admins who ban newcomers
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Still as fun in 2026 as it was back in 2005. There are still active servers - you always have a few to choose from”
Steam review · 277.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“Still fun after all these years thanks to a dedicated and polite gamer community!”
Steam review · 1070.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“There are no killstreaks, battle passes, weapon skins, or endless progression systems. Just two teams, a handful of iconic maps, and gameplay that rewards teamwork, positioning, map knowledge, and raw skill.”
Steam review · 2034 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 positive reviews
“The guns feel great and behave exactly exactly how you would expect them to.”
Steam review · 1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“+good weapon selection for all classes +interesting game modes +beautifully made maps”
Steam review · translated · 11.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“For the longest time it was the only game that i could run on my 2GB Ram laptop without issues and is genuinely fun”
Steam review · 24.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“40 year old single dads going on power trips banning you for the slightest transgressions of their silly made up rules.”
Steam review · 1.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Even if you wanted to play, you would be hard put to find a server with anyone actually playing in it.”
Steam review · 0.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“This is a M1 Garand. It DOESN'T HIT ANYTHING”
Steam review · 0.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“Valve have a history of updating this game since 2013 and it breaks the game...then they never fix what they broke.”
Steam review · 111.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“grenade spam and badly designed maps ruin the game.”
Steam review · 2.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“It used to be a really awesome game, but nowadays it's become unplayable. There are so many cheaters around.”
Steam review · 2834.7 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Steam doesn’t list requirements for this game.
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Striking Soviet retro-futurist atmosphere
− Annoying protagonist and weak dialogue
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Excellent story and characters
− Still buggy and unpolished
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Noticeably improves aim
− Paywalls and subscription pushed everywhere
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Photorealistic graphics and immersion
− Matchmaking, party play and P2P servers broken
analyzed 1 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click