Truly distinct asymmetric factions
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“The competing "nations" are very different, unlike the Civ series, where they are 90% the same - and you can win with any of them.”
Steam review · 466.1 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A distinctive, beautiful fantasy 4X with truly asymmetric factions, quests and great music. Skip it if you dislike clunky UI, slow initiative-based combat, or need rock-solid stability on modern systems.
Great for
Civ fans wanting a fantasy 4X with very different factions, quests and strong atmosphere
Main risk
Clunky UI and combat plus launch crashes on newer systems can ruin the experience
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“The competing "nations" are very different, unlike the Civ series, where they are 90% the same - and you can win with any of them.”
Steam review · 466.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“This is what Civ 6 should have been, never mind Civ 7.”
Steam review · 189.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Amplitude have some of the best art designs I've ever seen in the 4x genre.”
Steam review · 214.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“The lore is deep and interesting, the civilizations are intriguing and unique, and the quest system is just incredibly fun.”
Steam review · 56.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“Replayable, new game each time. Challenging! Thoughtful strategy game, you really need to be thinking a few turns ahead.”
Steam review · 992.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“The battle system is also much better and provides a lot of flexibility.”
Steam review · 21.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Every menu in this game is counterintuitive and akwardly designed.”
Steam review · 1.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“But 5 days ago, it just started crashing as soon as you hit play.”
Steam review · 434 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“in Civilization I would be halfway to an empire after 100 rounds, in ENDLESS™ Legend I have done absolutly nothing after 100 rounds.”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“Combats so clunky and long that it will get you seething.”
Steam review · 131 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 negative reviews
“Game ruined by the totally unnecessary "winter" mechanics.”
Steam review · 48.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 30 negative reviews
“Netcode is horrendous and the game frequently desynchronizes, even with Community Patch installed”
Steam review · 7.5 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Best space 4X on the market
− DLC overpriced and essential
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Beautiful, relaxing soundtrack and atmosphere
− Shallow, boring, repetitive gameplay
analyzed 37 min ago

+ Much improved by patches since launch
− Overpriced DLC and monetization
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Best Civ game in the series
− Won't launch on modern systems
analyzed 1 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click