Best space 4X on the market
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“If you like complex grand strategy games, this one is pretty much the archetype for the genre.”
Steam review · 5718.1 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A deep, endlessly replayable space 4X with great emergent storytelling and modding, but it's heavily DLC-dependent and expensive, with late-game lag. Skip it if you hate paying for DLC or object to generative AI.
Great for
Sci-fi fans who like roleplay-driven, long grand strategy campaigns and mods, and can tolerate a steep learning curve.
Main risk
Paying $300-400 for DLC the game feels built around, then hitting late-game lag and big reworks.
122 recent reviews
Many recent negative reviews cite Paradox's use of generative AI (e.g. in the Nomads DLC), plus DLC prices around $300-400 and the subscription. Fairly confident these drive the dip.
122 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“If you like complex grand strategy games, this one is pretty much the archetype for the genre.”
Steam review · 5718.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“Every time I play it's a completely different experience every single time.”
Steam review · 1096.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“This game gives me the same "just one more turn" itch that Civ V used to”
Steam review · 66.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 positive reviews
“It comes from the emergent story telling that this games mechanics allow for.”
Steam review · 158.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“The modding scene is huge, turning the game into a customizable sandbox with overhauls, new events, ship sets, QoL tools, and deeper mechanics.”
Steam review · 1341.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“Best support i've seen (ongoing patches, more dlcs, redesigning of game-mechanics)”
Steam review · 911.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“Stellaris will never be worth 400 dollars.”
Steam review · 469.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“this has to be the fourth or fifth time they've completely funadmentally redesigned how the game works”
Steam review · 329.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Takes a minimum of 3 undeterministic crashes to even load/resume a game.”
Steam review · 4715.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“I was quite happy with Stellaris before they started using Generative AI.”
Steam review · 28.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“the "Fastest" speed in like 2300 is slower than the "Normal" speed in 2200.”
Steam review · 467.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 negative reviews
“Multiplayer is permanently broken since version 4”
Steam review · 634.5 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Great Three Kingdoms setting and atmosphere
− Frequent crashes and startup failures
analyzed 8 min ago

+ Huge depth and replayability
− Overpriced, excessive DLC
analyzed 51 min ago

+ Much improved by patches since launch
− Overpriced DLC and monetization
analyzed 2 h ago

+ Addictive "one more turn" loop
− 2K EULA, privacy and mandatory account
analyzed 3 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click