Tense, challenging co-op teamwork
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“During the last third of the round, the danger's so intense: it requires the entire team working together to survive.”
Steam review · 665.4 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A hardcore Night-of-the-Dead-style squad survival game best played in co-op with friends. Skip it if you have an AMD GPU, want solo depth, or need an active multiplayer community.
Great for
Players with a group of friends who enjoy hard, teamwork-driven co-op survival like Warcraft 3 Night of the Dead
Main risk
Black screen on AMD GPUs and an empty multiplayer scene leave you with a clunky solo campaign
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“During the last third of the round, the danger's so intense: it requires the entire team working together to survive.”
Steam review · 665.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“The characters similar to Starcraft's Terran infantry with full customization from skills to weapons to power-ups to even the ammo type.”
Steam review · 6.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“If you played the Warcraft 3 Custom Map Night of the Dead ( NotD ) or the various versions of it in SC2, you will feel pleasantly reminded of them once playing this game.”
Steam review · 67.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“The atmosphere is superb, the characters are decently written, and goals and tasks are varied.”
Steam review · translated · 10.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“The game has big replayability, randomized missions, locations, monster spawns, bosses, everything to make every single dollar spent on it worth it.”
Steam review · 216.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“I got Red Solstice on sale for 5AUD and do not regret a bit. It's worth at least 20.”
Steam review · 10 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“I am not interested in playing a game with such a stale gameplay loop.”
Steam review · 3.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“it was necessary to have one leader among your people who will be selected at all times. Just this one feature ruins the whole party based experience”
Steam review · 19.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“Unfortunately, this game is unplayable to AMD users apparently, judging by the number of AMD users that have expressed issues with this title.”
Steam review · 0.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“Multiple times I have logged on to find fewer than 10 people online. There is no community to play with”
Steam review · 34 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“I couldn't tell when - or if - the wave of enemies charging at me will ever end or pause: they just keep coming.”
Steam review · 5.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 negative reviews
“Probably the most toxic 'coop' community I have ever encountered, we are talking DOTA 2 level hostility towards new players.”
Steam review · 79.8 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Tactical squad combat with RPG progression
− Won't launch or crashes on modern PCs
analyzed 15 min ago

+ Nostalgic childhood classic that still holds up
− Game won't launch or crashes
analyzed 31 min ago

+ Unique, asymmetric civilizations
− Crashes and instability after updates
analyzed 6 h ago

+ Clans play very differently
− Freezes and crashes since Definitive Edition
analyzed 7 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click