Nostalgia and timeless classic feel
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“This WAS my child hood at 11 years old and Ill never forget the great memories I had playing this with my friends.”
Steam review · 8.7 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A beloved, atmospheric WWII campaign across Soviet, British and American fronts that still plays well. Skip it if you hate paying $20 for an old game, want lively multiplayer, or dislike grenade spam.
Great for
Nostalgic WWII shooter fans and campaign players who want a grounded, no-frills classic, ideally bought on sale
Main risk
May not launch on modern PCs (grey or black screen, crashes), and the price feels steep for a 2005 game
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“This WAS my child hood at 11 years old and Ill never forget the great memories I had playing this with my friends.”
Steam review · 8.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“I really liked how the campaigns were divided up, giving you the freedom to choose which front you wanted to play.”
Steam review · 13.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“For a 20+ year old game, it runs remarkably well on a modern PC without any patches or tweaks.”
Steam review · 5.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“Loved the intense battlefield atmosphere, huge enemy presence, memorable locations, sound design, and the realistic feel it achieved for 2005.”
Steam review · 10.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“A classic FPS shooter that still looks and plays great, with an active competitive scene in 2026.”
Steam review · 1266.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“No stupid skins, no sprinting, no SBMM. Just pure gunplay.”
Steam review · 272.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“It doesn't work at all on my Windows 10 machine (i7-6700K and GTX 1060).”
Steam review · 0.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Charging this much money for a 21 year old game is nothing but sheer greed.”
Steam review · 9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Only bot and hacker servers. Confusing as hell.”
Steam review · 1.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“Literally 80 % of the CoD 2 campaign consists of fighting in some town or village streets”
Steam review · 6.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“Just not as good as Call of Duty 1 or United Offensive.”
Steam review · 32.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“the game just keeps spamming enemies, and all those enemies just keep your spamming you with grenades.”
Steam review · 28.8 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Striking Soviet retro-futurist atmosphere
− Annoying protagonist and weak dialogue
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Excellent story and characters
− Still buggy and unpolished
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Noticeably improves aim
− Paywalls and subscription pushed everywhere
analyzed 9 h ago

+ Photorealistic graphics and immersion
− Matchmaking, party play and P2P servers broken
analyzed 10 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click