Deep, detailed WW2 simulation
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Is the only game about WW2 who allows the player to fully control the military, economy and diplomacy of any country in the world at that time.”
Steam review · 920.7 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$9.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 53 min ago
A deep, brutally complex WW2 grand strategy sim with great order-of-battle and logistics, but it often crashes or won't launch on modern PCs and needs DLC. Skip it if you want accessible.
Great for
Hardcore strategy fans who love micromanagement, logistics and detailed WW2 simulation, ideally with BlackICE
Main risk
Crashes or won't launch on modern systems, plus a steep learning curve and DLC-locked features
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“Is the only game about WW2 who allows the player to fully control the military, economy and diplomacy of any country in the world at that time.”
Steam review · 920.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“Divisions actually mean something - you can't pump out hundreds of divisions as any nation, and even as the great powers you're constrained by historical plausibility.”
Steam review · 205.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“THE POSSIBLITIES ARE ENDLESS!”
Steam review · 298.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“the thrill of Micromanaging your own units individually is a lot more rewarding than hoi4's automation”
Steam review · 29.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“This game, with the black ice mod, is the most addictive game I've ever played.”
Steam review · 599.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 positive reviews
“Goes on sale for about 3 dollars and the addons and mods are very cheap and great to use.”
Steam review · 4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Paradox left this game in a broken state with severe crashes and resolution issues on modern operating systems.”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“requiring you to babysit an exhaustive order of battle for thirty minutes just to nudge a single division toward the front.”
Steam review · 37.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 negative reviews
“You are forced to buy the expansions just to get basic mechanics and fixes that should have been in the vanilla game.”
Steam review · 4.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 negative reviews
“Because the developers abandoned the game to focus on sequels, major performance bugs and AI flaws were left permanently unfixed”
Steam review · 5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 negative reviews
“Cluttered with meaningless details and railroaded gameplay.”
Steam review · 127.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 negative reviews
“The game barely explains its own mechanics, so a new player is basically expected to read guides, watch tutorials and study the interface before they can even start enjoying the game.”
Steam review · 2.7 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Huge depth and ambition
− Unfinished, sold at full price, DLC concerns
analyzed 23 h ago

+ Faithful MOO2 successor
− Weak real-time combat and ship design
analyzed 9 d ago

+ Deep economy and politics simulation
− Automated, buggy war and naval system
analyzed 10 d ago

+ Emergent dynasty drama and storytelling
− Predatory, expensive DLC with content locked behind it
analyzed 10 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click