Great with friends in co-op
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Surviving with friends is extremely enjoyable! With 3 or 4 friends, everyone can take care of something, so building a base becomes extremely quick.”
Steam review · 602.8 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A deep, replayable zombie survival sandbox with great base building and horde nights, best with friends. Skip at full price if you dislike constant system reworks or the dev controversy.
Great for
Co-op groups who love base building, horde-night defense and modding
Main risk
Updates keep reworking systems and the developers are in controversy, so long-time fans feel the game got worse
162 recent reviews
Many recent negatives are driven by developer controversy (JaWoodle lawsuit, AI-generated images) and, in Russian reviews, a mandatory Discord login that blocks launching. Some also report bugs after the 3.0 update.
162 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“Surviving with friends is extremely enjoyable! With 3 or 4 friends, everyone can take care of something, so building a base becomes extremely quick.”
Steam review · 602.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“The building system is incredibly flexible, one of the best in any survival game.”
Steam review · 458.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“Surviving the red moon is satisfying every single time.”
Steam review · 458.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 positive reviews
“Mods Completely Change the Game”
Steam review · 391.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“11 years later and I'm still finding POIs that I've never seen before”
Steam review · 1252.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 positive reviews
“The customizability for this game is phenomenal. You can play it exactly how you want to play it and change the rate of progression if you choose.”
Steam review · 520.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“Then the Devs started messing with it. Starting changing things around because people were 'trivializing' things.”
Steam review · 124.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Punishing independent content creators with legal threats and copyright strikes over an administrative mistake made by the developers themselves is completely unacceptable.”
Steam review · 118 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“45$ for a game that came out in 2013 what are we doing.”
Steam review · 500.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“This game runs like crap even when your system eclipse the hardware that the devs. recommend for a smooth experience.”
Steam review · 99.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“The new skill progression system based on finding and reading books makes absolutely no sense.”
Steam review · 782.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“They behave like they have a degree in civil engineering, calculating the absolute weakest block of your base and tunneling straight for it.”
Steam review · 9.9 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Pals as workers and base building
− Late-game grind
analyzed 13 h ago

+ Authentic Dune atmosphere and lore
− Loss of gear or base to bugs and decay
analyzed 52 min ago

+ Smooth, satisfying parkour
− Clunky combat and enemy scaling
analyzed 54 min ago

+ Unique traversal: snowboards, gliders, grappling hooks
− Snow map and snowboards removed
analyzed 1 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click