Nostalgic, timeless charm
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“I played this game as a child, I'm playing it as an adult, and I will play it until I die.”
Steam review · 55.8 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$19.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 1 h ago
A deep, charming 2003 city-builder with a great soundtrack and a thriving mod scene, but it crashes and fights modern PCs. Skip it if you won't tinker or save often.
Great for
Patient city-builder fans and nostalgic players willing to install mods like NAM and save often
Main risk
Frequent crashes, no autosave and failing to launch on modern systems can cost hours of progress
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“I played this game as a child, I'm playing it as an adult, and I will play it until I die.”
Steam review · 55.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“the modding community for SC4 is better than Maxis ever was, they keep this game fresh even after 20+ years.”
Steam review · 42.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“Somehow, this ancient game is a better experience than Cities: Skylines.”
Steam review · 63.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“It offers deep, satisfying simulation where traffic, wealth levels, education, pollution, and regional connections all matter.”
Steam review · 30.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“Also, the music SLAPS. One of my favorite game OSTs of all time for sure.”
Steam review · 63.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“build cities of 10-20 millions people with no population limit! And that's thanks to regions”
Steam review · 43.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 2 negative reviews
“it crashes every 30 mins because its too old and 32 bit.”
Steam review · 35.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“Does not function at all on Windows 11. I spent half an hour trying to fix it with mods but it still will not launch.”
Steam review · 18.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“they are selling a 20 year old game for $20 which doesn't even work on modern PC's without 3rd party .dll patches”
Steam review · 47.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 negative reviews
“Can't get the resolution to 1920x1080. Tried everything.”
Steam review · 0.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 negative reviews
“The UI is extremely clumsy, the mechanics are a bit boring, and the progression is actually really weird.”
Steam review · 11.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 negative reviews
“Game crashed and lost ten hours of progression. what kind of game doesn't autosave progress in 2026 ??”
Steam review · 4.5 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Several genres mixed into one
− Incomplete or poor English translation
analyzed 3 h ago

+ Relaxing and addictive time-killer
− Heavy paywalls and microtransactions
analyzed 4 h ago

+ Responsive developers and regular balance patches
− Broken balance and one dominant meta
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Great co-op and multiplayer with friends
− Weak AI, combat and diplomacy
analyzed 1 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click