Lots of replayability and content
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“There is just so much content in this game.”
Steam review · 275 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
An addictive, darkly funny pandemic strategy game with lots of modes, but runs can feel samey, RNG-driven and punishing at higher difficulty. Skip it at full price if you want deep, varied strategy.
Great for
Players who like short, replayable strategy runs and dark humor, ideally bought on sale
Main risk
Runs feel repetitive with one winning strategy and heavy RNG, so interest fades after a few hours
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“There is just so much content in this game.”
Steam review · 275 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“being able to name your disease anything really makes this game more funnier.”
Steam review · 3.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“I remember playing plague inc as a kid and this game not only stands up but has gotten better with time.”
Steam review · 2.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“If you evolve lethal symptoms too early, countries will notice and start shutting down airports and borders before you've spread globally.”
Steam review · 6.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“I have no idea why I play this game so much, it's incredibly addictive and the amount of stuff you can do with this gameplay loop is practically limitless.”
Steam review · 102.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 positive reviews
“For 10 years they've continued to update this game! Bravo Ndemic Creations!”
Steam review · 46.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“It's the same scenario, same winning strategy even if you play the game on Mega Brutal difficulty, same game every single time.”
Steam review · 8.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“I tested this many many times in many many ways and found that rng holds sway over your run more than anything you actually choose.”
Steam review · 4.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“the game does not teaches you how to or when to upgrade something, or what countries are recommended to infect first”
Steam review · 1.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“Otherwise $15 is WAY too much for what you actually get with the game.”
Steam review · 8.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“infect greenland and new zealand as fast as possible or your run is ♥♥♥♥♥♥”
Steam review · 1.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 negative reviews
“The game no longer works - it crashes after a couple of minutes.”
Steam review · translated · 78.8 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Best space 4X on the market
− DLC overpriced and essential
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Addictive and endlessly replayable
− Broken behavior/communication score system
analyzed 2 d ago

+ Passion project, deeply missed
− Arc launcher and startup failures
analyzed 3 min ago

+ Faithful D&D lore and characters
− Aggressive monetization and pay-to-win feel
analyzed 36 min ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click