Nostalgic childhood game
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“This was the best game of my childhood.”
Steam review · translated · 0.2 h played ↗
Panzar
Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Mixed · 57%Mixed · 57%Panzar Studio2013MOBA · Action · RPG
Free to play
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 5 h ago
The verdict
A fast, class-based fantasy team PvP brawler with distinctive combat and good looks for its age, but it's effectively abandoned: few players, bot-filled matches and heavy pay-to-win. Skip it if you want a living game.
Great for
Nostalgic players and friend groups who enjoy teamwork-heavy class-based PvP and don't mind bots
Main risk
Almost no players, so matches are mostly bots or long queues, and progression is gated by donations
What players love
Good graphics for its age, runs on weak PCs
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“It would run even on a calculator, and the graphics are still good enough in 2026.”
Steam review · translated · 26.8 h played ↗
Varied classes and team-based combat
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“Eight classes, chaotic team battles, and non-target combat make Panzar surprisingly fun despite its age.”
Steam review · 1 h played ↗
Varied maps and modes
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“The maps and modes are a joy of their own. They're really different and don't get old quickly.”
Steam review · translated · 2 h played ↗
Can be played without donating
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 positive reviews
“If you understand the game and mechanics, you don't even need to donate; you can play fine against top players.”
Steam review · translated · 337.8 h played ↗
What players complain about
Pay-to-win monetization
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“it's 100% a pay to win game. You can buy levels, better items, more gold”
Steam review · 0.8 h played ↗
Dead playerbase, bots and long queues
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“There are very few matches - average wait is 10 minutes.”
Steam review · translated · 207.2 h played ↗
Unbalanced matchmaking and classes
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“They throw you with 500 power against an opponent with 1300.”
Steam review · translated · 25.6 h played ↗
Abandoned by developers, no updates
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“no updates for 10 years.”
Steam review · translated · 280.6 h played ↗
Long, unskippable tutorial
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“I need to go through 9999 tutorial games with no way to skip!”
Steam review · translated · 4.1 h played ↗
System requirements
From the Steam store page
Steam Deck: Unknown12 GB
Minimum
OSWindows® XP
ProcessorIntel® Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz or AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 5600+ 2.8 GHz
Memory2 GB RAM
GraphicsNVIDIA® GeForce® 8800 GT or ATI Radeon HD 4870
Storage12 GB available space
Recommended
OSWindows® Vista/7/8/10
ProcessorIntel® Core Quad Q9450 2.6 GHz or AMD Phenom II x4 920 2.8 GHz
Memory4 GB RAM
GraphicsNVIDIA® GeForce GTX 470 or AMD Radeon HD 6790
Storage12 GB available space
OSWindows® XP
ProcessorIntel® Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz or AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 5600+ 2.8 GHz
Memory2 GB RAM
GraphicsNVIDIA® GeForce® 8800 GT or ATI Radeon HD 4870
Storage12 GB available space
More games to check
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
Bloodline Champions
Not enough reviews
+ Fast, intense matches with no farming
− Dead playerbase, long queues, no support
analyzed 4 d ago
SMITE 2
Mixed · 63%
+ Better graphics and engine than Smite 1
− Greedy monetization and cash grab
analyzed 5 d ago
Dreadnought
Not enough reviews
+ Unique giant spaceship combat
− Tiny playerbase, long queues, mostly bots
analyzed 10 d ago
Vainglory
Mixed · 66%
+ Great characters, graphics and lore
− Game abandoned and servers dead
analyzed 10 d ago
Weekly digest
Fresh games worth a look, in your inbox
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click