Immersive sound, visuals and destruction
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“Even in 2026, the visuals hold up beautifully, and the immersive sound design perfectly captures the chaos of WWII.”
Steam review · 26.6 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A gritty, tactical WWII RTS with great cover mechanics, sound and atmosphere, but heavy DLC paywalls, a divisive Soviet campaign and server or launch problems. Skip it if you hate paying for DLC.
Great for
Players who enjoy tactical WWII RTS with cover, positioning, and co-op or skirmishes against AI
Main risk
Factions, commanders and missions are locked behind DLC, and the game may fail to launch or connect.
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“Even in 2026, the visuals hold up beautifully, and the immersive sound design perfectly captures the chaos of WWII.”
Steam review · 26.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“The pacing feels better, the battles are more intense, and the visual and audio effects make the combat feel much more immersive.”
Steam review · 157.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“An immense RTS with a truly gigantic amount of content.”
Steam review · 526.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“Positioning, cover, flanking, unit preservation, and knowing when to retreat actually matter, which makes every battle feel satisfying when a plan works.”
Steam review · 156.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“Playing this in multiplayer with my friends brought some of the most fun, nerve wracking and blood rushing moments of my gaming life.”
Steam review · 239.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 positive reviews
“within 10 mins of playing I felt like I'd been playing it for weeks.”
Steam review · 98 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“It's a really fun game, brought down by being one of the most shameless nickel&dime simulators I've ever played.”
Steam review · 10.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“the campaign AI ignores fog of war.”
Steam review · 51.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“The game literally will not start.”
Steam review · 0.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“The game is not bad as a strategy, but the story is outrageous cranberry-style propaganda.”
Steam review · translated · 0.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“The pathfinding is absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. For this reason alone I can't recommend this game.”
Steam review · 355.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“this game never manages to contact a server.........dont waste your money....”
Steam review · 1.8 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Best entry in the Warhammer trilogy
− Expensive DLC locks core content
analyzed 1 h ago

+ Timeless classic RTS
− Retired and obsolete next to the Definitive Edition
analyzed 1 h ago

+ Nostalgia and a faithful, polished remaster
− Update bugs and crashes
analyzed 3 h ago

+ Pals as workers and base building
− Late-game grind
analyzed 20 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click