Attractive graphics and street-level view
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“The graphics are incredibly beautiful and you can zoom in right up close to the action”
Steam review · 243.8 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$9.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 2 h ago
A big, good-looking city builder with city-to-city trading, but its single-core engine lags and bugs out as cities grow. Skip it if you can get Cities: Skylines.
Great for
Sale-price buyers who love city builders and want multi-city trade, huge maps and mods on a modest PC
Main risk
Single-core engine and memory leaks make bigger cities lag to unplayable, plus bugs and crashes on modern PCs
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“The graphics are incredibly beautiful and you can zoom in right up close to the action”
Steam review · 243.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“There's a lot of depth to the game play, and the graphics are really good too.”
Steam review · 46.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“a beautifully interconnected resource economy that makes building specialized cities so much more rewarding”
Steam review · 0.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“If you're looking for a dollar-store cities skylines that can run on a potato, this is your game”
Steam review · 3.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“The game scales extremely well, allowing for truly MASSIVE cities to be build.”
Steam review · 15.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 positive reviews
“The main draw is the modding community - there are hundreds of mods available on xlnation”
Steam review · 99.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“This is not that game and is inferior in nearly every way.”
Steam review · 0.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“No matter how good your PC is, the game is limited to only using 1 core and up to 4 gigs of ram”
Steam review · 5.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“The save feature doesn't work and the game is too slow with even a small city of <25,000 people.”
Steam review · 14.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Placing roads is truly infuriating. A single road shouldn't be this hard to build.”
Steam review · 4.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“with the huge memory leaks, the longer you play (or load a long playted map) the worse the lag gets, eventually it will just chain crash”
Steam review · 7.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“No longer seems to work.”
Steam review · 20.6 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Playable free-to-play at your own pace
− Extreme pay-to-win
analyzed 24 min ago

+ Playable free without paying
− Flash/Chrome plugin error blocks launch
analyzed 33 min ago

+ Cute, cozy fairy-tale art and vibe
− Too short with little late-game content
analyzed 57 min ago

+ Faithful to the original, great nostalgia
− Many bugs and soft-locks, some game-breaking
analyzed 1 h ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click