Fondly remembered, beloved game
Mentioned in ~4 in 5 positive reviews
“i will forever love and cherish the years i spent playing this great game.”
Steam review · 1160.8 h played ↗
Heroes & Generals
Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Mixed · 61%Mixed · 61%TLM Partners2016FPS · Shooter · Action
The verdict
Heroes & Generals was a beloved free WWII FPS/strategy hybrid, but official servers shut down in 2023 and it cannot be played. Skip it unless you want a fan revival.
Great for
Nostalgic veterans looking for the fan-made revival projects
Main risk
Official servers are shut down, so you cannot play it at all
What players love
Goofy, memorable moments like bike riding
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 positive reviews
“Finding a random bicycle and pedaling into battle was amazing!”
Steam review · 485.8 h played ↗
Community revival projects exist
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“Game has been rebuilt by the community! lookup "hng sunrise"”
Steam review · 549 h played ↗
Great free-to-play shooter with variety
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“One of the best free games, it was great fun!”
Steam review · translated from Russian · 14.4 h played ↗
Big-scale WWII battles with a war layer
Mentioned in ~1 in 17 positive reviews
“The idea of battles actually affecting a larger war map was cool and made matches feel like they mattered.”
Steam review · 7.4 h played ↗
Better than Enlisted
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 positive reviews
“you were cooler than Enlisted”
Steam review · translated from Russian · 3.8 h played ↗
What players complain about
Servers shut down, game unplayable
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“I found out the servers are down since 2023. Please don't download the game”
Steam review · 9.4 h played ↗
Developers' greed and abandonment
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“they just shut down the game. and I've put a lot of money into the game...”
Steam review · 383.3 h played ↗
Updates made balance and gameplay worse
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“the Armor 2.0 update is a disaster and probably the main reason why most people are leaving”
Steam review · 666.2 h played ↗
Pay-to-win and microtransactions
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“The main issue is the pay to win free to play model. It totally sucks.”
Steam review · 2383.8 h played ↗
Punishing grind
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“What can I say? This game was always a huge grind-fest.”
Steam review · 542.5 h played ↗
Faction imbalance and bad matchmaking
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“The weakest side in the game is the USSR.”
Steam review · translated from Russian · 92.8 h played ↗
System requirements
From the Steam store page
Steam Deck: Unknown3 GB
Minimum
OSWindows 7 and up
Processor2GHz CPU w. dual-core
Memory4 GB RAM
GraphicsATI HD 4810 / Nvidia 9600GT or higher
Storage3 GB available space
Recommended
OSWindows 10 x64
ProcessorIntel i5 / AMD Ryzen 5 or higher
Memory8 GB RAM
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 / AMD HD 6870 or higher
Storage3 GB available space
OSWindows 7 and up
Processor2GHz CPU w. dual-core
Memory4 GB RAM
GraphicsATI HD 4810 / Nvidia 9600GT or higher
Storage3 GB available space
More games to check
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
Atomic Heart
Very Positive · 82%+ Striking Soviet retro-futurist atmosphere
− Annoying protagonist and weak dialogue
analyzed 14 h ago
Cyberpunk 2077
Very Positive · 88%+ Excellent story and characters
− Still buggy and unpolished
analyzed 12 h ago
Bodycam
Very Positive · 81%+ Photorealistic graphics and immersion
− Matchmaking, party play and P2P servers broken
analyzed 12 h ago
Apex Legends™
Mostly Positive · 75%+ Fast, intense, high-skill, addictive loop
− Rampant cheaters and weak anti-cheat
analyzed 12 h ago
Weekly digest
Fresh games worth a look, in your inbox
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click