High replayability from races, classes and random maps
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“it's still got a lot of replayability, just from the many, many different map, race and hero combinations available.”
Steam review · 96.2 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$29.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 5 h ago
A deep fantasy 4X with excellent hex-based tactical battles, hero progression and huge replayability. Skip it if you want deep empire management or hate extra accounts.
Great for
Fans of Heroes of Might and Magic or Civilization who love tactical battles and hero leveling
Main risk
Shallow empire management, repetitive battles, AI spamming top-tier units, and a required third-party launcher account
111 recent reviews
Most recent negative reviews protest a Paradox Discord moderation incident involving Atatürk profile pictures, not gameplay. Recent positive reviewers also say the bomb is unrelated to the game. Fairly confident.
111 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“it's still got a lot of replayability, just from the many, many different map, race and hero combinations available.”
Steam review · 96.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 positive reviews
“When armies clash, the game drops you into a hex-based battlefield where positioning, flanking, abilities and terrain actually matter.”
Steam review · 483.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“My favourite part is seeing my heroes and units level up over the course of a campaign and become near invincible against the computer opponent.”
Steam review · 772.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“We have played a lot of local multiplayer, as well as over the internet and it never disapointed.”
Steam review · 667.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“I come back to play AOW3 after hundreds hours of AOW4, go figure why. 3 is just better in game play.”
Steam review · 323.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 positive reviews
“me: i’ll just play a quick match. also me, 153 hours later: why is the sun gone.”
Steam review · 153.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 11 negative reviews
“an Orc, a Toad, and an Elf are literally just interchangeable skins wearing different stat buffs.”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“Requires a secondary account and the devs think it is okay to defend this by saying "you don't need it for single player".”
Steam review · 0.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“the tactical combat—supposedly the series' pride and joy—is painfully slow and repetitive.”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 negative reviews
“shallow empire management and repetitive diplomatic interactions make long-term campaign play feel monotonous.”
Steam review · 8.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 negative reviews
“One of the most imbalanced games I've ever played. Opponents are massively overpowered.”
Steam review · 17.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 30 negative reviews
“Multiplayer doesn't work. We couldn't connect to a friend even through Hamachi and similar tools.”
Steam review · translated · 10 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Hilarious with friends
− Clunky controls and bad camera
analyzed 3 d ago

+ First-person aiming removes hit-chance RNG
− Bugs, softlocks and crashes
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Considered the best Total War
− AI-upscaled art and cash grab remaster
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Among the best Total War games
− Remaster controversy and delisting
analyzed 4 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click