Performance improved after patches
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“the January Update fixed all my stuttering and massive frame drops on the "busier" areas of the game.”
Steam review · 542.3 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
Fun, fluid monster-hunting combat with a big roster, held back by crashes (especially on AMD GPUs), easy pacing and a dull story. Skip it if you want a hard, methodical MH or have a crash-prone PC.
Great for
Newcomers and co-op groups who want fast, smooth monster fights and deep gear and fashion grinding
Main risk
Random crashes (GPU/D3D errors) and weak performance can make it unplayable on some PCs
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“the January Update fixed all my stuttering and massive frame drops on the "busier" areas of the game.”
Steam review · 542.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“The gameplay is fun and satisfying. The weapon combos are relatively easy to chain, and the weapons genuinely all feel effective and unique.”
Steam review · 104.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“The world feels alive in a way the series has never achieved before.”
Steam review · 75.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“Probably the easiest monster hunter game to start playing if this is your first monster hunter.”
Steam review · 74.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 positive reviews
“I love playing with friends and I have always wanted a game where I could fight giant monsters with friends.”
Steam review · 5.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“So many variations and customization involved with a plethora of Armor pieces you can acquire”
Steam review · 222 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“The worst performance in any monster hunter game I have ever played.”
Steam review · 98.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“Capcom's incompetency has lead this game to be full of crashes. Crashes that are constant, inconsistent, and obtusely persistent.”
Steam review · 98.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“the game spends around 50 hours feeling like an extended tutorial before you finally reach the content that makes Monster Hunter fun.”
Steam review · 140.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“the new Gold Edition feels like a slap in the face to early supporters.”
Steam review · 572.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“Even if you skip cutscenes, you can't skip the walk and talk sections.”
Steam review · 45.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 negative reviews
“Steam Deck verified is a joke when it can't even keep a stable 30fps with minimum graphics settings and ultra-performance upscaling.”
Steam review · 10.9 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Vast, rewarding open world to explore
− Paid Tarnished Edition DLC backlash
analyzed 2 h ago

+ Best gunplay in the series
− Poor optimization and stuttering
analyzed 11 min ago

+ Immersive, authentic Hogwarts atmosphere
− Repetitive, empty open world and collectibles
analyzed 13 min ago

+ Deep build variety and skill trees
− Paid classes and broken no-paid-content promises
analyzed 24 min ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click