Nostalgia that still holds up
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“This game is as fun today as it was 25 years ago.”
Steam review · 9.3 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$14.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 6 h ago
A timeless 1999 turn-based artillery classic with deep weapons and a high skill ceiling, best with friends. Skip it if you want modern UI, rebindable controls, or painless online setup.
Great for
Nostalgic fans and friend groups who want chaotic, high-skill-ceiling turn-based artillery fights
Main risk
Online play via WormNET is unreliable or hard to set up, and controls and UI are dated
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“This game is as fun today as it was 25 years ago.”
Steam review · 9.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“This is the best game to play with friends period.”
Steam review · 9.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“the best 2d worms game, no contest. buy this one and have a lot of fun. it's an absolutely timeless classic.”
Steam review · 15.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“The game is from 1999 and it is still getting updates and support and the servers are still running.”
Steam review · 25.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 positive reviews
“All sorts of weapons from bazookas and grenades, to poking and baseball bats, to banana bombs and flying sheep.”
Steam review · 15.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 positive reviews
“Low barrier to entry, but a high skill ceiling.”
Steam review · 172.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“i bought this game for me and my friends and its imposible to conect to wormnet and create a game we only managed to do it once on 20 tries”
Steam review · 9.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“Controls are weird and not customizable (ex: Enter and Backspace are both jump, but different kinds of jumps).”
Steam review · 0.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“you have to navigate an interface made entirely of unlabeled images.”
Steam review · 0.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“Won't run in fullscreen making it unplayable at such a low resolution.”
Steam review · 6.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“The basic training section ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ sucks and you need to finish it to access the single-player content.”
Steam review · 4.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 negative reviews
“this game is 23 years old and they are still charging $15 for it...”
Steam review · 3.2 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Hilarious with friends
− Clunky controls and bad camera
analyzed 3 d ago

+ First-person aiming removes hit-chance RNG
− Bugs, softlocks and crashes
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Considered the best Total War
− AI-upscaled art and cash grab remaster
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Among the best Total War games
− Remaster controversy and delisting
analyzed 4 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click