Civ-like with a fantasy magic twist
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 positive reviews
“This plays very similarly, but with the addition of magic it adds a whole new dynamic that really shakes up the formula.”
Steam review · 11.9 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$24.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 5 h ago
A simplified, combat-focused fantasy Civ with magic, terraforming and leveling heroes, very addictive for newcomers. Skip it if you want deep diplomacy, a smart AI or a stable late game.
Great for
Newcomers to 4X and Master of Magic fans who want fantasy combat, spells and heroes
Main risk
Shallow, repetitive play with weak AI, endless monster spawns and unfixed bugs
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 positive reviews
“This plays very similarly, but with the addition of magic it adds a whole new dynamic that really shakes up the formula.”
Steam review · 11.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“An interesting 4X game with powerful terraforming abilities (you can create seas, remove mountains)”
Steam review · 53.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“a real "one more turn" itch creator”
Steam review · 174.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“This is perhaps the best beginner 4X ever.”
Steam review · 18.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“It's a little different every time you play because the map changes, the monsters change, and your can change the race you are playing.”
Steam review · 363.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 positive reviews
“5 out of 5 for value. I bought it on sale and then played it for 183 hours over the last month.”
Steam review · 183.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“A game is total trash when you can't fix the constant crashing bugs since the game came out.”
Steam review · 192.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“The main problem with this Civ-like is that the AI simply does not provide a challenge on any difficulty setting.”
Steam review · 9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“the economic and city management parts of the game are shallow.”
Steam review · 41.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“Units are automatically selected at random, deselecting is tedious and has the chance of not working at all.”
Steam review · 3.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“turn the late game into hours of waiting for enough money to purchase and upgrade your powerful units while you click to build the same things in 50 different towns”
Steam review · 15.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“Get ready for an endless sea of "neutrals" and "monsters". No, really.”
Steam review · 35.2 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Hilarious with friends
− Clunky controls and bad camera
analyzed 3 d ago

+ First-person aiming removes hit-chance RNG
− Bugs, softlocks and crashes
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Considered the best Total War
− AI-upscaled art and cash grab remaster
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Among the best Total War games
− Remaster controversy and delisting
analyzed 4 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click