Best COD, classic multiplayer
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“No battlepass, not too much grind for weapon unlocks, there are gold camos but idk it just doesnt feel like a chore like the modern games”
Steam review · 4.7 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A beloved classic COD multiplayer with zombies and a campaign, but official PC servers suffer from hackers, security exploit fears, a tiny playerbase and a full price. Skip it if you want safe, busy public lobbies.
Great for
Nostalgic COD fans who will play via Plutonium, or want the campaign and zombies
Main risk
Official online play is hacker-ridden, has security exploits and few players for the full price
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“No battlepass, not too much grind for weapon unlocks, there are gold camos but idk it just doesnt feel like a chore like the modern games”
Steam review · 4.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“Amazing game, burst of nostalgia everytime I play it.”
Steam review · 3.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 positive reviews
“The maps were goated, the guns and attachments felt balanced. And every single map had its own playstyle”
Steam review · 5.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“Call of duty multiplayer alone is not worth it but with zombies its worth it”
Steam review · 1.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 positive reviews
“the servers are dead, but there are still lot of active players on plutonium community servers”
Steam review · 7.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“Only good if you like to play againt cheaters almost every match”
Steam review · 76.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“There's an exploit if you don't use Plutonium that will genuinely allow a player if they so wish to control your own PC.”
Steam review · 0.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“It's almost impossible to even start an original TDM match due to low player number.”
Steam review · 103 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“Servers are broken. you get kicked for no reason, not really a kick but it just says steam authorization failed.”
Steam review · 4.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“after 12 years its still 60 bucks and they dont keep up with the servers anymore so there is no reason that it should be 60 dollars anymore”
Steam review · 18.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“Game will not run and will immediately crash with an "Unhandled exception"”
Steam review · 1463.3 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Striking Soviet retro-futurist atmosphere
− Annoying protagonist and weak dialogue
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Excellent story and characters
− Still buggy and unpolished
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Noticeably improves aim
− Paywalls and subscription pushed everywhere
analyzed 1 d ago

+ Photorealistic graphics and immersion
− Matchmaking, party play and P2P servers broken
analyzed 1 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click