Great fun in co-op with a friend
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“It's one of my top go to games for co-op, in which it really shines.”
Steam review · 18.2 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A fun, chaotic trap-and-shooter hybrid that shines in co-op and offers lots of replay. Skip it if you want a solo, trap-focused experience or expect it to beat OMD2.
Great for
Duo co-op players who enjoy trap combos, orc-slaughtering chaos, and chasing high scores
Main risk
Traps feel weak and the game plays like a shooter, with co-op disconnects and crashes
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 positive reviews
“It's one of my top go to games for co-op, in which it really shines.”
Steam review · 18.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“Successfully combines tower defense and TPS mechanics into a fast-paced and highly additive experience.”
Steam review · 56.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“the trap variety is huge, and there are so many different strategies depending on your playstyle.”
Steam review · 88 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“With a main campaign, two side campaigns, endless levels, and the randomized boon/bane scramble mode, this game is tons of fun”
Steam review · 177.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 positive reviews
“Especially the war scenarios which are basically huge siege maps complete with archers, knights, catapults, giant flip traps”
Steam review · 18.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“The cutscenes are dope. The voice acting is good. The lines are quippy and witty.”
Steam review · 26.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“It's a game about traps, except the traps suck. Seriously. The traps feel like they do almost nothing”
Steam review · 12.5 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Just play OMD2 instead. OMD3 is almost a straight downgrade from its predecessor.”
Steam review · 13.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“always starved for money, you never really get to build anything satisfying, always just the bare minimum”
Steam review · 16.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“Thumbs down for archaic connectivity where if a player disconnects, there is no ability to re-join, which kills the run.”
Steam review · 22.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 negative reviews
“This game will crash very often when the first two never did. Cannot even Endless mode because of the crashes.”
Steam review · 1.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“Level 14 for example was so atrociously bugged that even the best strategy was useless bc of enemies randomly clipping thru walls/floors and directly into the rift”
Steam review · 59.4 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Satisfying mix of action and tower defense
− Won't launch or run on modern PCs
analyzed 4 h ago

+ Addictive mine-then-defend loop
− Repetitive and shallow over time
analyzed 21 h ago

+ Unique FPS and tower defense blend
− Worse than Sanctum 1, with features cut
analyzed 22 h ago

+ Addictive loot grind and progression
− Aggressive monetization and paywalled heroes
analyzed 1 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click