Patches keep the meta fresh
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“The fact that champions get nerfed and buffed based on how tournaments play out is clever beyond description.”
Steam review · 5.6 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
$9.99
Open on Steam ↗US Steam price, checked 5 h ago
A cheap, addictive MOBA-draft autobattler where pick/ban and shifting patch metas are the real game. Skip it if you want deep management, stats that matter, or fast-forwardable fights.
Great for
MOBA fans who love drafting, counterpicks and chasing an evolving meta, solo or with friends
Main risk
Stats, training and management feel meaningless, and it turns repetitive with unskippable fights.
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 positive reviews
“The fact that champions get nerfed and buffed based on how tournaments play out is clever beyond description.”
Steam review · 5.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“The only game that gets the Pick/Ban phase right.”
Steam review · 50.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“its simple, but the strategy gets very complicated as you go.”
Steam review · 58.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“Beyond addicting. If you like management games of any type this game will be amazing”
Steam review · 3.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 15 positive reviews
“The main plus is no micro needed: you pick and plan calmly, then just watch the result.”
Steam review · translated · 121.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 25 positive reviews
“Very fun multiplayer experience if you can get a group of people.”
Steam review · 23.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Stats do not matter in this game. It is only drafting that matters.”
Steam review · 5.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 4 negative reviews
“Secondly, crafting is random? really?”
Steam review · 3.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Initially seems very fun, but gets extremely repetitive very quickly.”
Steam review · 13.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“they follow a ♥♥♥♥ path and target the WORST possible target.”
Steam review · 8.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“a critical issue is that there is no way to speed up the combats.”
Steam review · 5.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 9 negative reviews
“There is literally NO WAY to keep players in your roster.”
Steam review · 11.9 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Emotional, well-written story
− Choices barely matter; story is railroaded
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Nostalgic classic that still holds up
− Constant crashes on modern Windows
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Fun, relaxing and good value on sale
− Buggy with frequent softlocks
analyzed 4 d ago

+ Adorable, well-written maids
− Too little content, short and shallow
analyzed 4 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click