Fast, satisfying arena combat
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“Every weapon serves a meaningful purpose rather than simply existing as another variation of an assault rifle.”
Steam review · 13.4 h played ↗

Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A fast, polished arena shooter with great weapons, vehicles and bots, but online is dead and campaign progress won't save without workarounds. Skip it if you want multiplayer or the livelier UT2004.
Great for
Arena-shooter fans who enjoy bot matches, vehicle modes and mods, and don't mind some setup
Main risk
Official servers are gone and campaign progress doesn't save without an online profile or patch
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 positive reviews
“Every weapon serves a meaningful purpose rather than simply existing as another variation of an assault rifle.”
Steam review · 13.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“Amazing graphics that hold up surprisingly well for a 15 year old game.”
Steam review · 15 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 8 positive reviews
“The Vehicle Capture the Flag and Warfare game modes were like crack to me.”
Steam review · 295.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“With decent bot AI, tons of really well made user maps and skins, and huge customization options, I still gladly play it to this day”
Steam review · 50.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 positive reviews
“Love the creativity of the community custom maps and game variations are just plain fun.”
Steam review · 97.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 30 positive reviews
“Plays excellent regardless if you play with gyro and dual analog, dual touch pads or mouse and keyboard while docked.”
Steam review · 66 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~2 in 5 negative reviews
“Screw Epic. They've deliberately made this borderline unplayable, effectively ripping it out of the hands of customers that already paid for it.”
Steam review · 0.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“big downgrade from UT2004, less maps, less game modes, movement and gunplay is way worse.”
Steam review · 3.1 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 negative reviews
“Cannot recommend this game since it was clearly meant for multiplayer and the servers have been shut down.”
Steam review · 13.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 negative reviews
“you cannot save your single player game progress while offline.”
Steam review · 19.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“It's nothing but putrid brown and grey, and you can't barely see the ammo pickups and enemies.”
Steam review · 7.8 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“My entire team sat in a leviathon in the middle of the map while i try capture nodes by myself.”
Steam review · 15 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Steam doesn’t list requirements for this game.
Other games we’ve read the reviews for

+ Goofy fun with friends
− Dead servers, lobbies full of bots
analyzed 5 d ago

+ Great potential and committed devs
− Impossible to find a match
analyzed 5 d ago

+ Fast, brutal, satisfying gunplay
− Bullet-sponge enemies and scarce ammo
analyzed 3 d ago

+ Improvement over the first game
− Crashes, freezes and progression bugs
analyzed 3 d ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click