Worth buying? What 300 Steam reviews say.Worth buying? Here’s what 300 Steam reviews actually say.
A gory, stressful co-op horror game with varied trials, constant updates and a fun hub, best with friends. Skip it if you object to AI-generated art, dislike online-only servers, or want a scary solo horror game.
Great for
Friend groups who want chaotic, gory co-op horror with lots of trials, cosmetics and a silly hub
Main risk
Online-only servers, lag or connection failures, and AI art controversy; it can feel repetitive or not scary
165 recent reviews
Many recent negatives cite mod support being removed, AI art backlash, and post-update lag, long loads and disconnects. Russian reviews report connection failures. Fairly confident these are new complaints.
165 recent reviews
Mentioned in ~1 in 5 positive reviews
“The atmosphere is incredible. The environments are dark, disturbing, and detailed, and the sound design deserves a lot of praise because every noise keeps you on edge.”
Steam review · 248.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 7 positive reviews
“One minute we’re laughing at someone else getting grabbed by an enemy, and the next I’m the one jumping out of my chair like my life genuinely depends on it.”
Steam review · 22.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 positive reviews
“The chess in the lobby is really good. Me and my friend spent half our time just playing chess”
Steam review · 9.2 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 positive reviews
“the devs are constantly releasing new content, so it takes a while for the game to start feeling repetitive”
Steam review · 108.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 19 positive reviews
“The game optimization is great too, and I haven't experienced any technical issues or stutters.”
Steam review · 14.4 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 21 positive reviews
“in this latest update they just did away with FOMO and released EVERY past event's cosmetics and whatnot to get with currency you just earn ingame by playing the game.”
Steam review · 37.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 3 negative reviews
“lying about having ai assets and then get forced by steam to include that u do is absolutely embarrassing and humiliating for respected cult classic game devs”
Steam review · 116.3 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 6 negative reviews
“Couldn't play, tried to get into the game for an hour without success (refunded the game).”
Steam review · translated from Russian · 0.6 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 10 negative reviews
“Once you've completed a dozen trials or so It feels like you've seen everything the game has to offer.”
Steam review · 14.7 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 12 negative reviews
“the rubberbanding issue has made the game unplayable for me. Constantly teleporting into traps and enemies and taking unavoidable hits to my trial score is frustrating”
Steam review · 37.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 13 negative reviews
“As an invader you spend 1/3 of your time stuck on bad cameras, then almost 2/3 of your time trying to find a survivor.”
Steam review · 19.9 h played ↗
Mentioned in ~1 in 14 negative reviews
“Finally uninstalled with the removal of mod support. I don't play competitive modes and never will, yet I have to be punished equally”
Steam review · 136.3 h played ↗
From the Steam store page
Minimum
Recommended
Other games we’ve read the reviews for
+ Photorealistic graphics and immersion
− Matchmaking, party play and P2P servers broken
analyzed 2 h ago
+ Huge Workshop wallpaper library
− Crashes, bugs and resource hogging
analyzed 2 h ago
+ Dedicated PvE mode
− Too many fast, janky enemies
analyzed 29 min ago
+ Great with friends in co-op
− Bad teammate AI
analyzed 39 min ago
Weekly digest
The most interesting games we’ve just analyzed, once a week.Once a week we send the most interesting games we’ve just analyzed: the verdict, top pros and cons, and what changed. No spam.
One email a week · unsubscribe in one click